Bit of a contradiction there, you call Green average, say stop lauding average Australian players and then praise Sammut who is the very definition of an average Australian player. Poor defender, drifts in and out of games and if you look in the dictionary under inconsistant theres a picture of Sammut.

It's far too early to jusge Green, I think this whole year it will be too early. I've seen Wigan play a few games this year and Finch looks average at best. Last year pre injury Orford looked average. In his first year in SL Matt King dreamed of being average. I could add the likes of Berrigan, Perry, Lima, O'Donnell, Riddell, Mason. The list is endless, some of these haven't had time to bed in yet, others had time and didn;t show up well and others took time and became very good. What none of these players where / are is average, there list of winners medals, caps, representative honours is endless theres just reasons they need time.

I don't just watch Rovers so whatever gave you that impression I'd forget it. I didn't say Deacon was scrum half I said he was the stand off alongside Finch. If Finch and Deacon click then Leuluai will be the hooker.

As for Green been involved for 20mins a game, what a load of tripe! Not only would he be involved more if the rest of our players would stop giving away penalties he can't run the game all over the park. Even the best half backs in the game struggle to direct play on their own without a scrum half to help out. If you think Sammutt is better then I suggest you look at how he is being used at the moment, off the bench, that doesnt look to me like a player that directs a team around the park and is integral to a teams attack. In Leuluai and Sammutt you have two players that play off the cuff, they are fast, illusive and skillful but not good team players.

You certainly underestimate Greens ability and seem to see the negative side of everything HKR. I know times are hard at Rovers at the moment and I accept there are better players in this league than both Dobson and Green however depending on what style of game your team is going to play Dobson would offer a more all round game than Leuluai yet wouldn't do something totally amazing and unexpected.

Ask yourself, if Dobson is not as good as Leuluai yet he has played 130 games for Wigan at scrum half why is it Dobson that has taken the accolades over the past two years and TL has been nowhere near the dream team?? Maybe you need to take your cherry and white glasses off for just one moment and realise we do actually have some better talent than Wigan in certain positions.

You dont seem to get the drift of my posts BR, the exact reason i was comparing Sammut to Green and stating Sammut scores some goods tries (i never praised him) was because he is, as you rightly say, very average at other aspects of the game..yet Green, who is probably not as good as Sammut, because he plays for Rovers is something special...you get my drift...???

If Green was playing for Crusaders, Salford, Wakefield or even Hull you wouldnt give him a second glance...in fact if he was playing for Hull i wager rovers fans would be saying what a poor signing he was in such an important position..

And while im on the subject, the Morgan decision to make him captain goes in his own hall of fame top 10 worst decisions ever...

Just to help you out in summary, Rugby League supporters tend to be biased towards their own players. (both consciously and sub-consciously)

Happy to help.

Nick , i guess you think the world is flat..., Leuluai is the scrum half, there is no question.., Finch has been signed as a stand off, Deacon is a bit part player at most...Leuluai has played 131 times for Wigan, 130 at scrum half...you cannot get more incontrovertible than that i am afraid....

I am sure Tom Leuluai must be devastated that Dobson got in the dream team chosen by a panel of whom half know precisely nothing, if only he could swap his Grand Final winners medal ( and the massive bonus), World Cup winners medal and Tri Nations winners medal and his huge respect within the RL world for a place in the dream team i am sure he would...

And see the above post re Sammut and Green , another who doesnt get it....

It must just be me that watches with two eyes Dave...

You'll still have an element of sub-conscious bias, we all do. Some of us are able to step away a bit more than others though and see bigger pictures/both sides of an arguement.

I have to do that a lot because of my job, although i don't know it much on RLfans, it's more fun to have the biased view.

You're not getting my drift either, in fact I think somewhere we are even agreeing. My point is that Green hasn't really set the world alight I agree. but in all fairness he's played 9 games for us, 7 of these in a side that had 3 of it better players out and one of whom who is our most influential play maker.

Where we differ is I'm willing to give him time, see if he builds up a partnership with Dobson, this point in this season is far too early to judge any player be it Green, Hall or Mason. I agree with Dave T, you do seem to have a downer on our players, I'm not into the red and white tinted glasses view but I'm also not a cup half empty man.

What is your view of the players I listed in my previous post, should they be / have been cast aside when they didn;t perform in a similar manner as you seem to have with Green.

To be fair what i did see of Riddell and Berrigan it was obvious they were very good players.., Riddell was part of the champion side , Berrigan was criminally misused by Hull in my opinion, would have loved to have seen him at Rovers.., from my limited evidence of the others i think O Donnell has already shown he is quality , Perry and Lima have yet to show much and Mason and Morgan need to decide why he is here...

The thing about all the above though is that they all have "runs on the board" in Morgan speak, all rep or international players who without question , have done it and a probably a good bet to come good.., Green has never done anything, has no runs on the board etc ..and in my opinion was not a good signing for such a pivotal role in such a supposedly aspirational team, i held this view prior to him signing and nothing i have seen has changed my mind..he is not a "winner"...the phrase "here for the experience" springs to mind.....one of the reasons i think we have missed the boat..we should have made a "quality" six and nine , as Nick quite rightly says, a priority...instead we give a reserve grader a two year deal and the captaincy.. for all the good it will do us.. i,e none., we might as well have given Bell two years to see if he can crack it...nothing to lose if we aint bothered about challenging..(and perhaps everything to gain..)

Think LB's stock is increasing by the day, he's pretty much owned everyone on this thread.