Joined: Jul 10 2011 Posts: 1479 Location: Converting the west to the promised land
Anyone with an ounce of knowledge about rugby league should know Withers is not a bad or average player! Was it me or did anyone not see him against St Helens? Half of you must be blind! He was by far our best player, defense and attack. And after he came off injured we did lose our way. Some of you lot wanna smell what your shovelling!
Joined: Sep 18 2010 Posts: 4623 Location: Easter Island
Hessle rover wrote:Anyone with an ounce of knowledge about rugby league should know Withers is not a bad or average player! Was it me or did anyone not see him against St Helens? Half of you must be blind! He was by far our best player, defense and attack. And after he came off injured we did lose our way. Some of you lot wanna smell what your shovelling!
Stevo could have played behind that pack and looked good, a decent hooker would have put the game beyond Saints.
Michelangelo, 1475-1564. ---------- Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it. ----------
Joined: Sep 18 2010 Posts: 4623 Location: Easter Island
It's great that your RL 'knowledge' entitles you to form an opinion on a player whos performed well for less than 40 minutes, an opinion that contracdicts my own and others that he is merely an average hooker. Like most of our rose tinted fans.
Withers was a good signing because of the cover he offers and the fact he's got experience (hopefully we use his experience in the NRL rather than at Crusaders) But that doesn't deter from the fact that there is a high possibility he isn't our best Hooker.
Michelangelo, 1475-1564. ---------- Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it. ----------
Joined: Jul 10 2011 Posts: 1479 Location: Converting the west to the promised land
Have played the game to a high standard and offciated too.Have you?? Ive listened to what you have to say, and my answer is still the same. Your a plonker!
Joined: Sep 18 2010 Posts: 4623 Location: Easter Island
Hessle rover wrote:Have played the game to a high standard and offciated too.Have you?? Ive listened to what you have to say, and my answer is still the same. Your a plonker!
You know when you're wrong when you have to resort to name calling.
Enjoy the game today, no fighting.
Michelangelo, 1475-1564. ---------- Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it. ----------
Joined: Aug 13 2011 Posts: 7194 Location: east east hull
dum-dum wrote:Oh, and to answer your question, yes I have, what does that matter?
i dont know what your downer on withers is but you talk about our pack yes it looks awesome when we have micky p and clinton on but when we have to spell them its a different story so maybe you should take them rose tinted specs off
einstien said insanity is when a person does the same thing over and over again but expects a different result
Joined: Mar 22 2009 Posts: 2397 Location: East Hull
Now now girls.
Frankie - its a forum its all about opinions my little keyboard warrior friend. Wether you are or not means naff all to anyone.
For me Wither is by far our best hooker but i still only think he is average now hes getting on. Hopefully his experience will make the other to better.
[quote="Adeybull"] so the panel took the same view as your excellent assessment.[/quote]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
