Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:Hull played well at Saints but 1st game of the season was a good time to play them.
Hudds did not have Brett Hodgson who is their key man when you played them and had a couple of scores chalked off i believe.
But no i wouldnt say they slipped up at all.
Hull have earnt there wins on merit as you can only play whats put in front of you.
Crusaders will be in the bottom 3 and again the wager is offered :D

berrigans bitch wrote:I will take that one

As far as you can only play what is in front of you, you guys certainly know about that eh

Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:Whats the bet, me singing Old Faithful on Robins Night

Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:Slightly biased.
Hull havent put a team to the sword the way Hudds and Saints have this season.
And its very unlikely that they would slip up against Salford and Crusaders.

Bertie wrote:Was it the same view and same price as 2009 ?

Jake the Peg wrote:Or rovers?

berrigans bitch wrote:Are you suggesting both Hudds & Saints slipped up against us then, because we won Saints convincingly and they had no big players missing, and we won Huddersfield in a good solid battle.

Also not sure teams slip up against Crusaders, they are not the whipping boys and I actually believe they will push for the play-offs, Witt is a great kicker and I expect they will be more than a handfull on the drier pitches as they have some speed.

wilde-robin wrote:when you sober up in the morning!!!! have a read what you typed,

berrigans bitch wrote:I can assure you not a drop has past my lips for 2 days...still recovering from friday

It appears you disagree with me then...fair do's