Alphabetti Spaghetti Go! wrote:His absence had zero effect on Friday's result.

During his previous absence when his wrist injury kept him out, we won 4 out of 5 games.

You keep believing we are a one man team, yet you can't make up your mind which man!

pedpower wrote:ok then i was just saying maybe cookie was dropped as he is a turd player, not really hard is it?

pedpower wrote:i have not got the time it would take agaes to explain to a simple minded rovers fan, bye for now

pedpower wrote:i have not got the time it would take agaes to explain to a simple minded rovers fan, bye for now

pedpower wrote:i have not got the time it would take agaes to explain to a simple minded rovers fan, bye for now

pedpower wrote:i have not got the time it would take agaes to explain to a simple minded rovers fan, bye for now

moxi1 wrote:Yes it did, we had no second phase in attack!

Alphabetti Spaghetti Go! wrote:We had no 1st phase!

With the pack so heavily dominated, Cooke would have had no effect on the result, only the margin perhaps?

walshy222 wrote:Has anybody heard the rumors about cookey fighting with his own players after the warrington cup game, this being the reason jm left him out on friday