rednwhite wrote:what Huddersfield have done its underhand and unethical it really annoys me how disrespectful and arrogant motives they have shown Wakefield. i acknowledge there is rivalries between the two. but rl is a family and pooing on their doorstep is unacceptable while on they have put themselves on a high horse and strutting.
I'm lost a bit bud, do you mean their signing of Ferguson or their interest in the young lads?
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Chang wrote:And of course your Coffeeness your last two purchases are young and upcoming british talent
I'm not the one using emotive language like "raping" Wakefield though. The inconvenient truth is that Hudgell would have shafted Wakefield and their SL status quicker than you can say "Masonwillbehereattheendof January" for a bigger slice of SL cash. Trying to make some moral capital for Rovers out of this given his stance is staggering hypocrisy.
You see whilst I am in agreement with you about the people and businesses involved/owed money what I find a little bit confusing is why we are required to sell everything we can to pay our creditors but Crusaders can write off all their debts EXCEPT ONE.[/quote]
I dont know enough about the Crusaders situation but whoever takes over eventually at Wakey maybe needs to be asking the RFL for clarification on this.
If you are not part of the solution then you are more likely part of the problem...
Mrs Barista wrote:I'm not the one using emotive language like "raping" Wakefield though. The inconvenient truth is that Hudgell would have shafted Wakefield and their SL status quicker than you can say "Masonwillbehereattheendof January" for a bigger slice of SL cash. Trying to make some moral capital for Rovers out of this given his stance is staggering hypocrisy.
It irrelevant, it's not about what you think others would do, it's what clubs are doing.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Joined: Jun 04 2006 Posts: 284 Location: Inbetween drinks
Mrs Barista wrote:I'm not the one using emotive language like "raping" Wakefield though. The inconvenient truth is that Hudgell would have shafted Wakefield and their SL status quicker than you can say "Masonwillbehereattheendof January" for a bigger slice of SL cash. Trying to make some moral capital for Rovers out of this given his stance is staggering hypocrisy.
Nope I have to admit you are not but a certain Mr Tool and Hapless Agar are doing a fine job themselves sticking the knife in and twisting it around a bit.
Joined: Aug 31 2005 Posts: 8546 Location: Location Location
I don't mind wakey at all. I think the main thing that is wrong is the way they appear to have not had the assistance of the RFL as Crusaders have. THat said, you cannot blame the administrators in any way, who are servicing the creditors, who after all, have been hit worst of all. When you run a club at a loss, sadly, this is what happens.
I hope Wakefield emerge strongly from this, but it might take a while.
Joined: Sep 23 2003 Posts: 14306 Location: East Hull
Mrs Barista wrote:I'm not the one using emotive language like "raping" Wakefield though. The inconvenient truth is that Hudgell would have shafted Wakefield and their SL status quicker than you can say "Masonwillbehereattheendof January" for a bigger slice of SL cash. Trying to make some moral capital for Rovers out of this given his stance is staggering hypocrisy.
Hasn't RBA already stated that this isn't a trolling or points scoring thread. For once leave your hatred of Hull KR aside FFS.
"They supercede individuals, they supercede the team and they supercede the club. Our club is a traditional, working class club and the supporters are loyal and passionate and to see them go away happy really makes my day." Craig Sandercock.
Joined: Mar 25 2008 Posts: 3679 Location: God's county
Never really liked Wakefield tbh ever since they got promoted in what I knew should have been "our year". But this is a horrible process to sit back and watch, I cannot imagine the way the fans must be feeling watching their club unravelled in a matter of weeks. As long as clubs are paying fair prices for these players and not waxing fat on Wakefield's plight by paying way under the odds I think it may help them in the long run. What it means in the short term, however, is anybody's guess!
What immortal hand or eye, Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?
Joined: Mar 11 2007 Posts: 5659 Location: Next to Ramsgate Sands c.1850 in West Hull
Easty wrote:What happens now. Their buyer could pull out due to the playing staff being raped. If the buyers do pull out then the administrators have alot to answer for.
These were exactly my thoughts as the events have unfolded. Very worrying situation and the RFL should step in to protect and ensure the immediate sale of the club.
Philip Larkin wrote:
There ain’t no music East side of this city That’s mellow like mine is, That’s mellow like mine.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum