FC MONK wrote:
...THOUGHT THEY WERE BIGGER THAN THEY ACTUALLY WERE. RING ANY BELLS

FC MONK wrote: the big 3 Hull, Leeds and Wigan

FC MONK wrote:I worded that wrong. Off the field nobody can come close to these 3.
Also what I was trying to say is, if you want to compete year after year you need a lot bigger gates than you can get.
Face facts over a long period of time you will be competing for middle places in SL ,as you would have been this year had you not spent more than you can afford.
Remember the balance of power is shifting...NOT

BESTY wrote:Yes i'd be in favour of that. The alternative is what we have now. Most clubs overspending, players demanding higher salaries and we're totally reliant on Sky money. The rfl are puppets who must dance to the paymasters tune, if sky said due to the economic climate we're dropping your money by 30% next time the contracts up for renewal what would our choices be? we'd only have one and that would be to take the offer and the game would be ruined further.

Seventies red wrote:What a pilloch!!.

Seventies red wrote:What a pilloch!!.

Uffa1964 wrote:Will your new electronic turnstyles cope with that?