Surely thats 2 things?

The second is hardly doing something wrong!

Why has this thread turned into a Fox v Briscoe debate?

Briscoe played today, Fox didn't. End of. Briscoe didn't get the support from his centre today. End of. The Aussies seemed to target that side in the first half, would they have done the same if Fox was playing? We will never know, (unless by some fluke we manage to get to the final, & Fox plays). My point is Fox & Briscoe are different players, they both have different strengths & weaknesses, they both deserve their England call up, they both will come away better players for the experience.

How or why this has turned into another ridiculous KR v FC thing, when we should all want England to do well is unbelievable.

Freezing on the stage?

okay.

26-0 down at half-time - do you think Tony Smith got the selection right?


Totally agree.


His ball recovery just wasn't up to scratch which resulted in an accumulation of pressure on which they capitalised.

So why in your opinion should he not be an international Centre or winger - In my opinion he can be a great centre and just because he has the 'mobility and strengh of a forward' does not mean he cant remain a back . And before you come back I will say Greg Inglis!!!!

is this the Peter Fox who is supposed to be the fastest man in league??

but for some "secret" reason he didnt!! and the fox who apparantly is less safer the briscoe??? hmmmm

Good evening mate. Told you Fox should have played...

got your Briscoes confused there you tool