Mrs Barista wrote:Makes Yeaman's selection all the more impressive then. Charlie Mullan said on RH that he voted for Blake Green as the competition's best stand-off, so you'd imagine Welham got at least one vote.
Not really,might of only been one vote,where as you were intimating that it was a large vote when the reality is far different.
Joined: Jul 18 2010 Posts: 1288 Location: where dobbins board & squad live west of the river
not many people would argue with the fact that Dobson has the best kicking game close to the oppositions line in the entire league so it would be interesting to see how many of kris welhams tries have come from pinpoint kicks in goal leaving him nothing more to do other than get his hand on the ball,the point being scoring more tries is not the only skill required in centre play,yeaman,s allround game puts him just ahead of welham IMO of course
eastul105 wrote lets be fair Mickey Paea is too good for us.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29816 Location: West Yorkshire
Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:Not really,might of only been one vote,where as you were intimating that it was a large vote when the reality is far different.
Not intimating anything. You've said Yeaman's not as good as Welham and implied that McNamara made a mistake in picking him in your opinion. You referenced Shenton as the automatic pick at centre. Most would agree that Atkins played very well this season. Yet despite all this "evidence", Yeaman is voted into the Dream Team ahead of all 3. It's not a panel of FC supporters, and as you say, is perhaps under-represented in terms of the Hull viewpoint. I say "well done Yeaman".
There's nothing more certain than that this coming weekend England will get turned over on the back of errors and missed tackles by Yeaman and/or Briscoe, but the fact is that McNamara's selection, supporting their Dream Team selection, has been justified up to now.
What a completely pointless Edit-AS competition this is, who gives a flying whether Yeaman has more studs in his boots or Welhams hair colour shows up better on Sky3D. England won a great game of rugby atthe weekend, executed a brilliant game plan and kept their heads to see out what was comfortable win in the end. i personally think mcnanmara deserves a hell of a lot of credit for this performance because no one (Sam Tomkins excluded) was stand out, they all did their Job executed his gameplan and did it well, they let NZ lose their heads and this played into our hands. At this time I couldn;t give a Edit-AS who's the best centre, winger or half back we just need to get behinf the team who ever is playing and hope they can up this performance next week and do the same to Australia, big task but it seems a lot more possible. The Welham, Yeaman debate can wait til next year and be decided on the pitch.
Think you all should look back over the posts and see how infantile you all look. My dads bigger than yours, bit pathetic really.... Grow up everyone.
Joined: Dec 17 2009 Posts: 2862 Location: live in gosport wos hull
barham red wrote:What a completely pointless Edit-AS competition this is, who gives a flying whether Yeaman has more studs in his boots or Welhams hair colour shows up better on Sky3D. England won a great game of rugby atthe weekend, executed a brilliant game plan and kept their heads to see out what was comfortable win in the end. i personally think mcnanmara deserves a hell of a lot of credit for this performance because no one (Sam Tomkins excluded) was stand out, they all did their Job executed his gameplan and did it well, they let NZ lose their heads and this played into our hands. At this time I couldn;t give a Edit-AS who's the best centre, winger or half back we just need to get behinf the team who ever is playing and hope they can up this performance next week and do the same to Australia, big task but it seems a lot more possible. The Welham, Yeaman debate can wait til next year and be decided on the pitch.
Think you all should look back over the posts and see how infantile you all look. My dads bigger than yours, bit pathetic really.... Grow up everyone.
Barham red i agree with every thing you have said some people need to get a life what a joke trying to say who is better, he was the Centre who was picked and let him get on with it nexst time it may be welham i hope
JOHN THE REDBOY I have been a rovers fan all my life and my grandkids are as well
Mrs Barista wrote:Not intimating anything. You've said Yeaman's not as good as Welham and implied that McNamara made a mistake in picking him in your opinion. You referenced Shenton as the automatic pick at centre. Most would agree that Atkins played very well this season. Yet despite all this "evidence", Yeaman is voted into the Dream Team ahead of all 3. It's not a panel of FC supporters, and as you say, is perhaps under-represented in terms of the Hull viewpoint. I say "well done Yeaman".
There's nothing more certain than that this coming weekend England will get turned over on the back of errors and missed tackles by Yeaman and/or Briscoe, but the fact is that McNamara's selection, supporting their Dream Team selection, has been justified up to now.
What you've got to realise is when the dream team doesn't include any Hull KR player it is meaningless however when Dobson was the 7 it was conclusive evidence that he was the ''best 7 in SL'.
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
barham red wrote:i personally think mcnanmara deserves a hell of a lot of credit for this performance because no one (Sam Tomkins excluded) was stand out, they all did their Job executed his gameplan and did it well, they let NZ lose their heads and this played into our hands.
I agree after last weeks game I said that McNamara had come up with a good game plan and he's done it again this week, maybe he's not such an awful coach after all?
I really don't know what's happened to New Zealand, they seemed devoid of ideas Marshall looked completely uninterested and Foran was completely anonymous after the off side try in the second minute.
My worry for next weekend is that a much more conservative and compact Australia will turn up. At Wembley we made about fifteen errors and they made about thirteen, it was almost as if both teams got a bit caught up with playing at Wembley. Australia won't do that next week.
barham red wrote:Think you all should look back over the posts and see how infantile you all look. My dads bigger than yours, bit pathetic really.... Grow up everyone.
Well I enjoyed it, I found it rather amusing.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
Old_Faithful_IAKW wrote:What you've got to realise is when the dream team doesn't include any Hull KR player it is meaningless however when Dobson was the 7 it was conclusive evidence that he was the ''best 7 in SL'.
I have no idea how you've extrapolated that from the last four or five pages, exactly the opposite would seem to apply.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Sandra The Terrorist wrote:Well I enjoyed it, I found it rather amusing.
Must admit I found it kiind of funny (when not embarrassed) it was a bit like the drunken fights you see round town. Mrs B - the drunken one who think they know it all, tries to belittle all around but just ends up coming across smug and self righteous and enevitably someone thumps them. Zod - Short fused and incendiary - the one who enivitably thumps the above GML - The one who has best intentions, wades in to break it up and ends up taking more of a pounding than the instigators. Marfa - The Edit-AS up girlfriend, wont let it lie, screams and shouts alot and ends up getting arrested. Pictured as that girl with the shoe at the derby match.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
