Joined: Sep 01 2006 Posts: 5139 Location: Wall Street
berrigans bitch wrote:Was the poster referring to when we had relegation or was he making a point that it is easier to compete and finish well due to salary cap now:wink:
No he was making the point that it is easier for teams coming into SL to compete quicker due to the salary cap. I was pointing out how wrong he was using Cas and Catalans as an example as both should have been relegated having just been promoted. The thing that kept them in SL was the RFL.
His same point cannot now be proven because there is no promotion or relegation, but the two new sides in this years SL finished bottom and second botton, again disproving his point.
Motto of the week -
It is the way of the weak to secretly bleat to those in authority rather than fight their own battles.
Gordon Gekko wrote:No he was making the point that it is easier for teams coming into SL to compete quicker due to the salary cap. I was pointing out how wrong he was using Cas and Catalans as an example as both should have been relegated having just been promoted. The thing that kept them in SL was the RFL.
His same point cannot now be proven because there is no promotion or relegation, but the two new sides in this years SL finished bottom and second botton, again disproving his point.
Actually it highlights how unstable a newly promoted team can be, take cats for example should have been relegated, by the 3rd season finished 3rd, not the best of seasons this year, yet here they are in the semi-final play-offs.
Joined: Sep 01 2006 Posts: 5139 Location: Wall Street
berrigans bitch wrote:Actually it highlights how unstable a newly promoted team can be, take cats for example should have been relegated, by the 3rd season finished 3rd, not the best of seasons this year, yet here they are in the semi-final play-offs.
It wasn't the salary cap that helped them finish higher though, it was better recruitment and better players and a helping hand from their special dispensation
Motto of the week -
It is the way of the weak to secretly bleat to those in authority rather than fight their own battles.
Joined: Jan 18 2005 Posts: 2362 Location: www.eastsidegym.co.uk
Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:Doesnt fit with the point he was making.
Yes it does, My point was it's easier to progress quickly. Your the one bring in the irrelevant points
“We will not accept a top eight finish as a barometer of supposed success at any point in the future whilst I am the owner of this club." Adam Pearson, FC Website 23-09-2011
Joined: Jan 18 2005 Posts: 2362 Location: www.eastsidegym.co.uk
Gordon Gekko wrote:No he was making the point that it is easier for teams coming into SL to compete quicker due to the salary cap. I was pointing out how wrong he was using Cas and Catalans as an example as both should have been relegated having just been promoted. The thing that kept them in SL was the RFL.
His same point cannot now be proven because there is no promotion or relegation, but the two new sides in this years SL finished bottom and second botton, again disproving his point.
My point is it is easier to build a decent side quickly because all teams are able to compete financially. Unlike when hull were promoted when all the best sides could spend millions more and also didn't have to offload players.
Celtics have struggled because they do not have the resources and also have been thrown in at the deep end whereas Rovers and Castleford had a nucleus to build on.
Salford and Celtics won't disprove my point until they have had 3 years as I was comparing your teams first 3 years and my teams first 3 years
“We will not accept a top eight finish as a barometer of supposed success at any point in the future whilst I am the owner of this club." Adam Pearson, FC Website 23-09-2011
Joined: Jun 17 2009 Posts: 1839 Location: West Hull, (enemy territory)
Cant really see what your driving at....
Hull KR
2007 - 11th
2008 - 7th
2009 - 4th lose our first 2 playoff games
= progress
Hull FC
1998 - 9th out of 12
1999 - 13th out of 14
2000 - 7th after merger with a far better side
2001 - 3rd, 4 years to make the playoffs then lose first 2 playoff games (no better than rovers then)
2002 - 5th, lose playoff again
2003 - 7th
2004 - 3rd, lose playoff again
2005 - 5th, win first ever playoff game after 5th attempt then lose 71 - 0 to bradford
2006 - 2nd, get to final but lose again so still no S/L trophy to shout about.
2007 - 4th, win one lose one
2008 - 11th
2009 - 12th
= decline
So it took hull 4 yrs to reach the playoffs and 8 yrs to win first playoff game, come back in 5 years and see how we are doing
really impressive 12yrs in super league...............NOT
Oh, and i nearly forgot, we are 7-3 up in derbies and by the next good friday derby we will have had the bragging rights for 958 of the 1089 days since we joined S/L.
Last edited by GraftonRed on Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GraftonRed wrote:Cant really see what your driving at....
Hull KR 2007 - 11th 2008 - 7th 2009 - 4th lose our first 2 playoff games = progress
Hull FC 1998 - 9th out of 12 1999 - 13th out of 14 2000 - 7th after merger with a far better side 2001 - 3rd, 4 years to make the playoffs then lose first 2 playoff games (no better than rovers then) 2002 - 5th, lose playoff again 2003 - 7th 2004 - 3rd, lose playoff again 2005 - 5th, win first ever playoff game after 5th attempt then lose 71 - 0 to bradford 2006 - 2nd, get to final but lose again so still no S/L trophy to shout about. 2007 - 4th, win one lose one 2008 - 11th 2009 - 12th = decline
So it took hull 4 yrs to reach the playoffs and 8 yrs to win first playoff game, come back in 5 years and see how we are doing
really impressive 12yrs in super league...............NOT
Challenge cup win and g/final more than most teams have achieved
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
GraftonRed wrote:Cant really see what your driving at....
Hull KR 2007 - 11th 2008 - 7th 2009 - 4th lose our first 2 playoff games = progress
Hull FC 1998 - 9th out of 12 1999 - 13th out of 14 2000 - 7th after merger with a far better side 2001 - 3rd, 4 years to make the playoffs then lose first 2 playoff games (no better than rovers then) 2002 - 5th, lose playoff again 2003 - 7th 2004 - 3rd, lose playoff again 2005 - 5th, win first ever playoff game after 5th attempt then lose 71 - 0 to bradford 2006 - 2nd, get to final but lose again so still no S/L trophy to shout about. 2007 - 4th, win one lose one 2008 - 11th 2009 - 12th = decline
So it took hull 4 yrs to reach the playoffs and 8 yrs to win first playoff game, come back in 5 years and see how we are doing
really impressive 12yrs in super league...............NOT
Oh, and i nearly forgot, we are 7-3 up in derbies and by the next good friday derby we will have had the bragging rights for 958 of the 1089 days since we joined S/L.
Edited. May as well bold your losses too, or it doesn't look as though they mean as much as they clearly do.
PS - your calculation of how many days bragging rights you may have had puts Mrs B to shame. Can we start giving you the same level of abuse as she gets on your board?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 33 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum