Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
tonylRobin wrote:why would it be ridiculous?
David Haye was 3 stone lighter than Audley Harrison but look at the outcome, its whats in your heart that matters, not your belly my dear.
Slight difference, Haye is a good professional boxer, Harrison is a poor pudding of a boxer whereas Mason is a big, tough RL player who won't back down. Radford might beat him in a boxing match, but I always rely on the old saying that 'a good big 'un will always beat a good little 'un'
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Joined: Oct 15 2008 Posts: 1944 Location: east hull
rover49 wrote:Slight difference, Haye is a good professional boxer, Harrison is a poor pudding of a boxer whereas Mason is a big, tough RL player who won't back down. Radford might beat him in a boxing match, but I always rely on the old saying that 'a good big 'un will always beat a good little 'un'
hhmmm id take little Mike Tyson over Big Willie Mason anytime
Joined: Sep 23 2006 Posts: 8033 Location: sea level once again
Mrs Barista wrote:If it's for charity, fair enough, but realistically:
Radford v Mason Age 31 v 30 Height 6ft 1 v 6ft 4 16st v 18st 2
Also, wasn't Mason such a keen boxer that he planned on pursuing a professional boxing career? Laudable idea if it's for the Steve Prescott fund or other charity, but lunacy on Radford's part IMO. On the other hand, if Radford won, how hilarious.
Familiar pattern. Listing a whole heap of excuses in advance in case the result doesn't go your way. I do that too.
Joined: Sep 23 2006 Posts: 8033 Location: sea level once again
One would assume due to his relative lack of bulk he would be able to easily out manoeuvre his slow and hulking opponent and torment him with superior hand speed.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Bobbin' Along wrote:One would assume due to his relative lack of bulk he would be able to easily out manoeuvre his slow and hulking opponent and torment him with superior hand speed.
On the other hand, if Mason won, how hilarious.
So why, in boxing, is being heavier classed as a weight "advantage"? And why, in boxing is being taller classed as a height "advantage"?
Joined: May 30 2009 Posts: 999 Location: EAST HULL TILL I DIE!!!
did you not watch the fraudley harrison v david haye fight, i dread to think what would have happened to audrey if he hadn't had the height and weight advantage!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
phleastyler wrote:did you not watch the fraudley harrison v david haye fight, i dread to think what would have happened to audrey if he hadn't had the height and weight advantage!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's not answering the question. What do "height advantage" and "weight advantage" mean, as they are commonly used boxing terms, are they not? Mason is currently training with a boxing coach it says in the Aussie press today. Maybe it's on.
Joined: May 30 2009 Posts: 999 Location: EAST HULL TILL I DIE!!!
to answer the direct question as i know you like to drift to say the least, height advantage means he's taller and generally has a better punching angle, weight advantage means he's heavier so theoretically more weight behind the punch so punches harder, audley??????????????
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
phleastyler wrote:to answer the direct question as i know you like to drift to say the least, height advantage means he's taller and generally has a better punching angle, weight advantage means he's heavier so theoretically more weight behind the punch so punches harder, audley??????????????
So it's generally accepted that being taller and heavier gives you an advantage in boxing, and as the exception that proves the rule, Audley is gash. Mason is younger too, and has great footwork. Poor Radders. What the hell is he thinking?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
