A unknown superstar wrote:Because he doesn't offer as much in attack as Tony does although he is a good support player (briscoe). But returning the ball didn't do anything part from duck and get tackled. where as tony will look for a gap and is a better link up player!

Bobbin' Along wrote:When I stated that Briscoe was the Hull player I'd most like to see at Rovers I was slated for it. The guy is and has always been a class act, and one of the bravest players I've had the privilege of seeing play. I understand where Sharp was coming from in keeping Motu, but we have benefitted in a big way.

PAUL M wrote:Two very good players vying for the same position, PS had to make a decision and did so. Its hard to choose between them but when they both play well they are top quality players.

Easty wrote:Your saying he had to make a choice why did he? Do you have an abundance of fullbacks? Or did the salary cap deem he had to release one and as Tony can play Hooker also he choose Tony. I'd go with that account myself which doesn't make Tony a better fullback then briscoe.

Easty wrote:a clue is the Red n White blinkers I am wearing.

HullRedRobin wrote:Good result at Warrigton Hutchie

Tony was amazing!!!

HullRedRobin wrote:Good result at Warrigton Hutchie

Tony was amazing!!!