Someday wrote:What we should ask are we that bad if we are why and has any one got the answer if so please tell us fans
I think after 13 rounds, the league table is a fair reflection, give or take. We’re missing a few, but with the exceptions of Lunt and Carney, and maybe Heffernan, we can still cover steady-away SL squad players with other steady-away SL squad players.
The club lost its way a bit after Morgan left. The drift accelerated in 2016. We bounced back well in 2017, and huge credit to everyone involved. But we must look like an accident-prone organisation to outsiders. Also the clean slate that gave us was in an empty-shelf recruitment market. Cas must currently provide a fairly attractive career option, but they signed James Green and Mitch Clark to boost their front row options.
Our benefactors still deserve huge credit, but it is increasingly for resilience rather than striking signs of drive and ambition.
I’m not sure what Peacock’s role is now. He seems like the sort of guy who, faced with a 15 foot high brick wall, would try to run through it. Even if it was only 15 feet wide. That’s harsh, and I respect the fact that he offered his resignation after we lost the MPG, and i’m sure he contributed in 2017. But I can’t help feeling that his strategising will be based on SL conventional wisdom. You learn more from failure than success though, so we’ve probably been good for him!
Sheens knows what he’s doing, but you can’t make bricks without straw. The most baffling thing there is that he identified the need for more strength and size after Wire in last year’s middle 8s, but by the new year we were going ‘mobile’ yet again. I know quality is thin on the ground, but that was a surprising failure. I see the logic of getting more minutes from him, as our biggest forward, and he’s gone pretty well, but we seemingly couldn’t wait to get Masoe on the lettuce and skimmed milk.
And breath...