Thanks. I notice you had some challenges about Willie Mason's attitude on one of the 2009 threads. Coincidentally those concerns seem to have disappeared recently too.

Opinions are like a**eholes as the saying goes.

I wonder if Jimmy Rule & Kath still think Dobson isn't good enough for FC?

Could that perhaps have anything to do with the feedback from Cowboys fans after the 2010 season?
I realise of course that it would be the first ever recorded incidence of a player's attitude improving, but the World is full of surprises.

Mrs Barista wrote:Opinions change over time, because: 1) Original opinion was based purely on nastiness because he signed for FC, at which point the value of his multiple Oz and SOO caps plummeted to zero. 2) 2 weeks ago in comparing the squads, the likes of Easty were saying O'Meley would bring nothing to Rovers squad and he wouldn't get in the 17. 3) Someone starts a thread on this board bringing in the Mason link with O'Meley and suddenly he's the best thing since sliced bread. Yes, I'm sure the fact that someone's fabricated a connection to him signing up with his buddy Mason is entirely coincidental with a change in the collective opinion of "O'Belly". Yes siree. Give it a rest. the original post was Quote:Would be a good signing for next year Team up with his best bud "if/when" he arrives, and doesnt look like opting to stay at FC at the moment... TBH id do it just to annoy "them" At no point has it being mentioned that O'Meley is even remotely interested in coming to Hull. You simply can't accept that where giving praise where praise is warranted. Your showing yourself up as a sad bint now with a severe chip on your shoulder. I'd also love to see where I posted saying O'Meley would bring nothing to Rovers. the thread is here viewtopic.php?f=59&t=480920&start=60 and I stated at the time that I'd only take Houghton. I never once mentioned O'meley adding nothing to Rovers. Now i can safely say two weeks on I'd love to have O'Meley starting alongside Clinton in our front row. I have no trouble admitting that fact.

Mrs Barista wrote:Opinions change over time, because: 1) Original opinion was based purely on nastiness because he signed for FC, at which point the value of his multiple Oz and SOO caps plummeted to zero. 2) 2 weeks ago in comparing the squads, the likes of Easty were saying O'Meley would bring nothing to Rovers squad and he wouldn't get in the 17. 3) Someone starts a thread on this board bringing in the Mason link with O'Meley and suddenly he's the best thing since sliced bread. Yes, I'm sure the fact that someone's fabricated a connection to him signing up with his buddy Mason is entirely coincidental with a change in the collective opinion of "O'Belly". Yes siree. Give it a rest. the original post was Quote:Would be a good signing for next year Team up with his best bud "if/when" he arrives, and doesnt look like opting to stay at FC at the moment... TBH id do it just to annoy "them" At no point has it being mentioned that O'Meley is even remotely interested in coming to Hull. You simply can't accept that where giving praise where praise is warranted. Your showing yourself up as a sad bint now with a severe chip on your shoulder. I'd also love to see where I posted saying O'Meley would bring nothing to Rovers. the thread is here viewtopic.php?f=59&t=480920&start=60 and I stated at the time that I'd only take Houghton. I never once mentioned O'meley adding nothing to Rovers. Now i can safely say two weeks on I'd love to have O'Meley starting alongside Clinton in our front row. I have no trouble admitting that fact.

LOL

Easty wrote: Your showing yourself up as a sad bint now Lovely. Resorting to personal insults, but not really ploughing a new furrow for you, so to speak. Easty wrote: I'd also love to see where I posted saying O'Meley would bring nothing to Rovers. the thread is here viewtopic.php?f=59&t=480920&start=60 and I stated at the time that I'd only take Houghton. I never once mentioned O'meley adding nothing to Rovers. Now i can safely say two weeks on I'd love to have O'Meley starting alongside Clinton in our front row. I have no trouble admitting that fact. 2 weeks ago you said only Houghton would bring anything to Rovers. You clearly rated Vella, Wheeldon, Lovegrove, Clinton and Watts all well ahead of O'Meley if you wouldn't entertain the possibility that could bring anything to the 17 at Rovers that those 5 can/do. 2 weeks on and he'd be a starting prop at Rovers? As said, I'm sure this is entirely coincidental timing with people starting to talk up the link with Mason.

Easty wrote: Your showing yourself up as a sad bint now Lovely. Resorting to personal insults, but not really ploughing a new furrow for you, so to speak. Easty wrote: I'd also love to see where I posted saying O'Meley would bring nothing to Rovers. the thread is here viewtopic.php?f=59&t=480920&start=60 and I stated at the time that I'd only take Houghton. I never once mentioned O'meley adding nothing to Rovers. Now i can safely say two weeks on I'd love to have O'Meley starting alongside Clinton in our front row. I have no trouble admitting that fact. 2 weeks ago you said only Houghton would bring anything to Rovers. You clearly rated Vella, Wheeldon, Lovegrove, Clinton and Watts all well ahead of O'Meley if you wouldn't entertain the possibility that could bring anything to the 17 at Rovers that those 5 can/do. 2 weeks on and he'd be a starting prop at Rovers? As said, I'm sure this is entirely coincidental timing with people starting to talk up the link with Mason.

What link. Mason will be playing for Hull KR & O'Meley for Hull FC. Your the only person who sees this imaginary link with O'Meley coming to Rovers. How many times do people need to state that an opinion is simply an opinion and can change. Should I take the definition of an opinion out the English dictionary for you?

I honestly can't believe I'm arguing with you over stating that O'Meley's performance in the last two games I've watched has changed my opinion of him. How really hard is this too understand?

And regarding having him as a starting prop yes wouldn't you have him starting? His performances in his last two outings has gave me the opinion that he has an immediate impact on a game starting from minute zero.

Time for a change, IMO.