How can you have a man of the match when you got your backsides kicked 0-60.
Best of luck for the rest of the season. COUGARS.
| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=445446 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Jemmo [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:44 am ] | ||||
| Post subject: | MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW | ||||
|
|||||
| Author: | cougarbar member [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
How can you have a man of the match when you got your backsides kicked 0-60. Best of luck for the rest of the season. COUGARS. |
|
| Author: | Jemmo [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
cougarbar member wrote:How can you have a man of the match when you got your backsides kicked 0-60. Best of luck for the rest of the season. COUGARS. So by your logic, if Keighley got beat 60 - 0 by anyone from Batley to Saints, none of your players could have possibly played any better than any of the others and all were at EXACTLY the same level? Also can you advise what is the scoreline which it is acceptable for us to vote over, so we know for future. What an odd, deluded view
|
|
| Author: | Wanderer [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
Jemmo wrote:So by your logic, if Keighley got beat 60 - 0 by anyone from Batley to Saints, none of your players could have possibly played any better than any of the others and all were at EXACTLY the same level? Also can you advise what is the scoreline which it is acceptable for us to vote over, so we know for future. What an odd, deluded view I concur. |
|
| Author: | barrowtilidie [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
i dO understand both points of view, cougers because, if you dont win, imo, man of the match shouldnt be awarded, as however well they have played, they havent played well enough, However, my method of picking a man of the match, is , if it was a close game. Pick a forward, if it was a walk over, pick a back good luck for the rest of the seoson |
|
| Author: | Jemmo [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
To be fair, if all our players played at 100% it was unlikely we would have won last night, as Barrow are obviously a better team. If Barrow lost 25 - 24 at Knowsley Road would that class as a loss, so not good enough? |
|
| Author: | Wanderer [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
There were 17 players on show. One of them is our Man of the Match because in our opinion (individually) that player contributed most to the cause on that occasion. The result is irrelevant to this process. |
|
| Author: | Stand-Offish [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
Perhaps they are confusing MOTM and DMOTM. There will always be a latter who may also be a former as well. I hope that is clear enough.  DTOTM = Doncaster's man of the match = the man on the Doncaster side that played best out of the Doncaster team regardless of how dire they were (for thickies). |
|
| Author: | aj-in-donny [ Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW |
Can we stop all this please because i read all of the above posts and then forgot to vote
|
|
| Author: | Jemmo [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:14 am ] | ||||
| Post subject: | Re: MoM v Barrow - VOTE NOW | ||||
|
|||||
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|