Wonder who the ex pro was who decided we had no player in contention for man of match.All four players from Leeds,seems strange.

Just Leeds getting preferential treatment again like they always do in every aspect of our game...

Hetherington

The new way of choosing is ridiculous. Go back to the way it was

Sinfield.

Last home gave v Warrington

F.C. beat wolves but the sky man of the match went to Warrington Clarke

We said that, but then realised that the majority of Wire fans were at home and able to vote whereas home fans are at the ground. Whilst we have the ability to vote still, I certainly don't think about it while at a game so I think we'll see this quite a lot with the new way of doing it.

Is not necessarily wrong that a player from a losing side can win MOM, especially in a fairly close game which that against Wire was so I'm not too fussed about that one. However to suggest that the top 4 candidates in a close game all come from one side is starting to stretch the bounds of credibility. If the mystery "former Super League star" who picked the 4 was named instead I'm fairly confident this wouldn't have happened, would it Mr Sinfield?

At least someone like Phil Clarke will openly put their name to contentious statements and declarations and not hide their identity.

To suggest a MoM can be decided at 60 minutes is ludicrous in the first place. Good Friday 2016 shows exactly what can happen in the final 20 minutes of a game.