Although very disappointed with the result i hope he doesnt and gives this team another chance against Wigan.
That said Pryce was poor at Catalan and again last night, and Watts has been the least effective of our props in all games so i would understand if Abdul came in for Pryce and Chris Green for Watts.
Once Fonua is fit i see him reverting to Centre and that might be the time to have a look at Lancaster or Naughton on the wing

Personally I hope he sticks with the same team, barring injuries. We've made minimal changes in the first three games and got two very good performances out of the team. Last night was an iffy performance but we was close to getting a result. So I think they deserve another chance to show what they can do.

I also think it will do us good to play a consistent line up as much as possible rather than chopping and changing every time a result doesn't go our way.

No need to panic imo, maybe start with ellis,and maybe bring naughton or Lancaster in,

Didn't sound like he was panicking in his radio interview. Sounded like he knew what had gone wrong and had a plan to address it. the only ones panicking are the fans with unrealistic expectations

Why would a change or two constitute panic ?

It wouldn't

Crazy talk.

I'd maybe give Naughton a go. Radford's usually quite analytical in selection so guessing he'll look at the main Wigan threats in the forwards and see whether he thinks Green brings something to the table the others don't to try and nullify their threat.

Naughton for Talanoa? Of the two wingers he was the least effective last night in my opinion and Micheals is by far the better defender. I see Micheals being dropped though.
And no, changing a few players isn't panic..we've lost one game.

Over the two I'd have Talanoa, been the better winger over the three games this year and offers more to the team IMO.

I hope Fonua has some pace as we are desperate for some in attack and defence.

I hope neither are starting next year on the wing.

Exactly why some of us are questioning whether there'll be changes. "Panic" is probably the wrong word to use but the question of whether Radford will or should make changes after one defeat is a valid one.

I can't speak for anyone else but I guess my concern is that if he makes any changes that he does it for the wrong reasons. That he makes a re-active change rather than a pro-active one. That he leaves someone out after one "bad" game rather than a tactical change designed to combat Wigan's threats.