This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway http://www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948

This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway http://www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948

Mrs Barista wrote:This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway http://www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948 And, if the vote goes against it, will Wigan still be able to fit Tomkins into their cap?

Mrs Barista wrote:This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway http://www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948 And, if the vote goes against it, will Wigan still be able to fit Tomkins into their cap?

ken davey makes some valid points

its a no for me regardless if we can afford it, it will go back to them who have and them who dont!

Interesting that the dobbins have changed sides...............

I sort of get the sentiment to retain players like Tomkins in Super League. But just not sure how many players/clubs it impacts.

How many of their homegrown players earn more than £100k? I don't think any of their 1-17 squad numbers are homegrown. Krissy Welham?

No but with their new benefactor they could have 3 world class players and "only" spend £450k

Oh yeah. Didn't read that bit properly.

Too subtle for me, I'm afraid.

Hard to argue with Ken Davy's points. Stupid idea being introduced at exactly the wrong time to suit one or two rich loudmouths.

No doubt it will pass easily.