Does having two average coaches really make good players bad?

I think we fans waaayyy over estimate the quailty of our side and perhaps we should accept the fact that we just aren't that good anymore, that our class players have had their day and Agar and Sharpe can't be blamed for the lack of quality they have to choose from.

Rich Horne isn't a 6, nobody wants Thorman or Lee at 7, but these are who the coaches have to work with. Good workmen shouldn't blame their tools but our coaches have a bag full of blunt ones if you ask me.

Richard, if that posts from you do us all a favour.

Fc put effort in last week for the first 30 minutes, quick play the balls and improved line speed worked very well untill we got knackered. Says alot about the conditioner i think

Yes .

agreed

Think it was more a case of trying everything we had (not much right now) at them first 30, couldn't get through, they score off there first serious attack. Heads go down, start feeling sorry for themselves, get battered.

an average coach would instill a game plan with first and second phase attack. Not take the ball standing still and all watch.

Poor coaching, poor team and pussy board.

The gash whats been served up from a "British" coach is absolute cack. This is NRL 4 years ago.

no dummy runners
no second phase
no running from deep
no play on the fifth tackle
no kicking game
no leadership
no idea
no game plan
no proper use of the bench
no plan b
no enthusiasm
no play offs (again)
no idea
no bloody pride


apart from that we are going on the right track