Joined: Sep 01 2006 Posts: 5139 Location: Wall Street
Another monumental stint for them today 60+ mins each. Unless Hull find someone else who can give them good minutes these two will surely end up with burn out come the business end of the season.
On a positve note I thought Kingy did ok today and will be better for the run out but outside of him i don't see anyone else capable of doing 15 mins or more.
Motto of the week -
It is the way of the weak to secretly bleat to those in authority rather than fight their own battles.
Gordon Gekko wrote:Another monumental stint for them today 60+ mins each. Unless Hull find someone else who can give them good minutes these two will surely end up with burn out come the business end of the season.
On a positve note I thought Kingy did ok today and will be better for the run out but outside of him i don't see anyone else capable of doing 15 mins or more.
Cusack only played 40. Went off after 20 and game on for the last 20. Thought Dowes played about 70 did he?
As you say though, we need to spell them better, King looked lively but short of practice and Moa just cant give the time. We looked lost after 20 mins when Cusack and Radders went off.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29797 Location: West Yorkshire
B0NES wrote:Why was Thackeray dropped ?
The only thing I can think of is that Thackray is match fit already and King/Moa aren't, and we need 5 matchfit props going into the 4 games in 13 days that starts next Sunday. I thought King looked pretty good, but Moa is a luxury we can't afford at the moment so would have gone with King and Thackray on the bench and Moa in the reserves.
Joined: Mar 28 2005 Posts: 20992 Location: THE HOME CITY OF LUKE CAMPBELL OLYMPIC GOLD MEDALIST
Mrs Barista wrote:The only thing I can think of is that Thackray is match fit already and King/Moa aren't, and we need 5 matchfit props going into the 4 games in 13 days that starts next Sunday. I thought King looked pretty good, but Moa is a luxury we can't afford at the moment so would have gone with King and Thackray on the bench and Moa in the reserves.
Awful by Agar then if thats true....and Maloneys little toe is more fit than Moa.
“We will not accept a top eight finish as a barometer of supposed success at any point in the future whilst I am the owner of this club.
Thats why you got the Bullet Agar...Adam Pearson wants winners...not useless gits like you.
"Rugby League is a simple game played by simple people. Rugby Union is a complex game played by wankers." L.Daley 2005
Mrs Barista wrote:The only thing I can think of is that Thackray is match fit already and King/Moa aren't, and we need 5 matchfit props going into the 4 games in 13 days that starts next Sunday. I thought King looked pretty good, but Moa is a luxury we can't afford at the moment so would have gone with King and Thackray on the bench and Moa in the reserves.
Then why not give King and Moa another run out in the reserves?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
