carl_spackler wrote:Exactly my point, it's how you use your weight. He's 101kg per SL website, 104kg per Leeds'. Our website has Dowes at 108kg, Cusack 103kg, King 108kg, and they're all actually shorter than Peacock. Their comparative ineffectiveness is therefore not down to their lack of size.
that and the fact peacock is solid muscle. he is literally massive. i shook his hand once he nearly tore it off!!! dowes,cusack and king are far from the most imposing figures. [please dont someone tell me muscle weighs more than fat,we all know this...]
i wouldnt go too much on the published weights anyway they are invariably inaccurate depending on when they are taken - pre-season/before a game/after a game. you can't really make a fair comparrison.