Joined: Sep 14 2009 Posts: 1606 Location: on route to old trafford via wembley
Kiljoy wrote:Well, this is pot calling the kettle black isn't it. I responded to a post about Hull KR so why was he concentrating on Hull KR so why wasn't he concentrating on Hull FC? The truth always hurts doesn't it. A club in freefall and disarray. In a stadium that they occupy by an accident of geography in that the Boulevard was only a few hundred yards from the MKM that is now your alleged home. Where are your income streams? Look at your published debts. You are actually bankrupt. Look at the posts from your own supporters. It doesn't need me to to highlight them. What have I said that is "unfounded"?
I will explain to you why.
Because one of your fans, the one that started this thread is on here 50 times a day telling us how we're rubbish and his team are great. So I thought I'd play along in his game of "My dad's bigger than your dad"
I enjoyed it, it brought back memories of when I was running around in the primary school playground as a child all those years ago.
Kiljoy wrote:Well, this is pot calling the kettle black isn't it. I responded to a post about Hull KR so why was he concentrating on Hull KR so why wasn't he concentrating on Hull FC? The truth always hurts doesn't it. A club in freefall and disarray. In a stadium that they occupy by an accident of geography in that the Boulevard was only a few hundred yards from the MKM that is now your alleged home. Where are your income streams? Look at your published debts. You are actually bankrupt. Look at the posts from your own supporters. It doesn't need me to to highlight them. What have I said that is "unfounded"?
I dont know why KR fans need to keep flogging this dead horse, we all know our situation.
For me it shows the mentality that they are more bothered about the club in 11th then 1st. Or maybe it hurts that despite the dross served up at FC people locally are more interested in the west side then east.
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 4422 Location: Posh Bransholme
Clifford back in squad for Barron I'd go Litten MacIntosh Carlos Sutcliffe Swift Macca Clifford Taylor Houghton Sao Griffin Savelio Cator Subs Brown/Gardiner Satae Dwyer Fash
Always the Optimist never the Pessimist. Glass Half full not half empty man me.
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25994 Location: Back in Hull.
Ellam wrote:Clifford back in squad for Barron I'd go Litten MacIntosh Carlos Sutcliffe Swift Macca Clifford Taylor Houghton Sao Griffin Savelio Cator Subs Brown/Gardiner Satae Dwyer Fash
I'd play Scott on the wing, how many chances cam Mcintosh get?
6 is a real area of weakness, McNamara is a better defender and Lovodua offers more in attack, neither are really good enough to play there.
Need to play really well to win, better than we have played all season
Think I’d roll the dice with either sutty or Carlos at 6. Both better in D than Joey & McIntosh. Even if we just use them as more of an off the cuff running threat.
I do think McIntosh gets blamed for every try, even when the blame lies with ball watching inside of him. You can’t deny he’s been poor.
For example Handleys try last week. It was on McNamara not shifting quick enough which meant everyone was ball watching inside of McIntosh. He then made the right decision and jammed in.
His execution of the jamming in was an awful tackle attempt and he probably should have stopped the try. For me the blame for that falls on the inside men.
However, if his execution is that poor when needed maybe we should give someone like Martin ago (I’ve always thought he looks better than Barron)
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8316 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
bonaire wrote:
Dave K. wrote:I'd play Scott on the wing, how many chances cam Mcintosh get?
6 is a real area of weakness, McNamara is a better defender and Lovodua offers more in attack, neither are really good enough to play there.
Need to play really well to win, better than we have played all season
think he will play Houghton at 6
That would be no better than having McNamara at 6 and in all honesty worse as he just isn’t able to do the minutes anymore and his defence is no longer such a strongpoint. I’d rather play Scott at centre and out Sutcliffe to 6 as that would at least give us something different and a bit more creativity. .
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
Chris71 wrote:That would be no better than having McNamara at 6 and in all honesty worse as he just isn’t able to do the minutes anymore and his defence is no longer such a strongpoint. I’d rather play Scott at centre and out Sutcliffe to 6 as that would at least give us something different and a bit more creativity. .
As fans i agree we need something different to McNamara at 6 who is just catch and pass but dont think Smith will do anything different other than to either leave McNamara there or go the safe route and play Houghton there who at least may take on the line occasionally
I think this will be a tight game this one , We have to improve both defence & attack to stand any chance of getting a result . Hudds arnt ripping up any trees at the moment . 6- 10 points either way .
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum