Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8195 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
rubber duckie wrote:
MorningGlory23 wrote:Bullll shittttt, ap did the right thing, letting radford do the post match sky interview then sacking him would of been worst. That killed AP to do that, he loves Radford, but was left with no choice for the good of the club
I don’t care what you think. It’s fact...in addition to your incorrect, AP didn’t do post match interview, he did a post-mortem sacking LR interview.
Utter disrespect...and it’s only some FC fans like yourself that don’t get it.
What fact are you referring to exactly? I think you will find he was asked by SKY for an interview so he let Radford tell the players whilst he faced the media to announce that club and him were parting with immediate affect. There was no disrepect at all and if you knew AP you would know seeing/hearing the emotion in him. Its the idiots like you who seem to think he was sacked live on tv.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
It’s was a whole package. Sacked live on air. It matters not a jot that he told him after leaving his seat. He made it public of his sacking live on air...period. Pathetic.
Packs Win Games Great Packs Make All Backs Look Class #onceawirealwaysawire
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25791 Location: Back in Hull.
rubber duckie wrote:It makes you wonder if Houghton purposefully looked backwards, his post match interview raised my eyebrows just before AP buried LR on live tv.
Making yourself you an idiot with stuff like this.
rubber duckie wrote:It’s was a whole package. Sacked live on air. It matters not a jot that he told him after leaving his seat. He made it public of his sacking live on air...period. Pathetic.
So what should he have done? Let Lee take the media duties, when he isn't employed by the club anymore? Let Andy Last go out to the camera's, to encourage more questions and rumours about why Radford wasn't doing them?
Or, nip it in the bud, explain what had happened, and be open and truthful?
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12647 Location: Leicestershire.
Spared him having to pointlessly front up to the Sky interview after a painfully bad performance and spoke respectfully of his contribution to Hull FC. If LR himself is disappointed with how the news was broken, that is up to him (I’ve seen no evidence that he is) - but I don’t see much reason to be outraged on his behalf based on what we know.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8195 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
rubber duckie wrote:It’s was a whole package. Sacked live on air. It matters not a jot that he told him after leaving his seat. He made it public of his sacking live on air...period. Pathetic.
He was not sacked live on air!! They had a discussion and both agreed the time had come to part ways! So there's a difference between making it public live or in a recorded interview? But obviously asking a guy who has just parted ways with a club to go in front of the cameras live on TV after one of the worst displays by any of his sides is really respectful isn't it!!!
Pearson spoke very highly and emotively about Radford and its clear its the hardest decision he's had to make and he has been very loyal and supportive of Radford probably for a season too long.
The fact you still state he was sacked live on air is pathetic when he clearly wasn't is obviously lost on you and shows you are a right muppet.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
