number 6 wrote:no naughton according to radford

straight swap for michaels

yorksguy1865 wrote:Not really gonna change much that, every team has been consistently attacking that side anyway, granted naughton has been better defensively than Michaels in my opinion.

Saf wrote:Wane again "biging" us up in The Hull Daily Mail again before the match, playing his mind games. Some would argue it worked last time. Also, I think he's taking the Mick, when he talks about the players on social media talking up our team spirit and when he says at the end "it was their best performance of the year, and they don't mind telling everyone about it." Thinks he's telling us to keep our mouths shut we've won nowt yet

Fields of Fire wrote:After how quick we played the ball last week Wigan will be doing everything to slow it down Thaler needs to be strong

airliebird,runninglate! wrote:I think this is a game to far. 5 day turnaround from saints is gonna be hard
I know we won well but in them conditions it'll taken a bit out the tank. We were intense and the build up will of been all week in the lead up. More so than a regular league game. Plus we've had a long hard run of games. Personally I'd of refreshed the squad quite a bit. But momentum is hard to argue against.

owd bird wrote:Wigan often have 3 sometimes 4 in the tackle, then each one in turn reganes his feet. how can they roll away as theyre supposed to do?

Fields of Fire wrote:That's the fine line that they bend which we'll have to try to win pens off

number 6 wrote:thaler wont give us anything in that area, prooved it at the kcom earlier in the league and previous matches at the dw stadium, he is weak in policing that area with wigan