knocker norton wrote:It must just be me who sees positives then.

On a different angle who are these other clubs with better signings for 2009.

Did the performance of the Saints and Leeds players at the world cup show anything?

Its not as if the likes of Gasnier or SBW or Lockyer are flooding into the country to provide world class opposition.

Jake the Peg wrote:People seem to be forgetting that we finished 11th last season and have lost the player who won us the bulk of the games we actually managed to win. We were miles behind some other sides last season and the gap doesn't seem any smaller to me now.

wolfie wrote:your some supporter,will you be going to watch them if you think there going to fail

Jake the Peg wrote:People seem to be forgetting that we finished 11th last season and have lost the player who won us the bulk of the games we actually managed to win. We were miles behind some other sides last season and the gap doesn't seem any smaller to me now.

Superbowl Scott wrote:Huddersfield and Catalans have both made better signings than us imo.

Superbowl Scott wrote:Huddersfield and Catalans have both made better signings than us imo.

wolfie wrote:so do you think calderwood,crocker,maloney are poor signings


wont even ask you about thorman cos i know your views on him

wolfie wrote:so do you think calderwood,crocker,maloney are poor signings


wont even ask you about thorman cos i know your views on him

Superbowl Scott wrote:Calderwood is our best signing for what we need.

Crocker is a brilliant player but we didnt really need him. I would have liked us to get a prop because imo we havent replaced Carvell.

Dont get me started on the Thorman signing :wink: