Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 7735 Location: Here there and everywhere
knockersbumpMKII wrote:I do believe that is what I have said, I don't care, I just don't beleive anything coming out from the club at the moment, the spin, lies and deceit gives me not a single iota of confidence in anything they say. As I said, telling us it's £XXXX averts away from the truth not just of the fee but the situation as a whole. i clearly said this before, If you and others want to beleive the £150k fee is accurate that's up to you, i don't. A press release, what's said by X, Y and z won't convince me.
As far as I'm concerned the intention was to let Westerman go, which is fine, that's how things are, players come and go and coaches/owners change their minds on such matters, but the bull coming out of the club and it being a last minute deal is garbage in my honest opinion. and if as many forummers have said it's too late to sign someone of quality to fill the void of his salary it just doesn't add up. Indeed if we were in for another player for the backline, again, why are we keeping Yeaman?
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25982 Location: Back in Hull.
Kosh wrote:Yeah - you don't really get the difference between fact and opinion, do you?
Oh well...
I understand very clearly and I have no problem with opinions, however like Carl did with his very good post (that I still didn't agree with but respected), you should learn to back up your opinion rather than just saying wrong.
I like Gelling, still rough around the edges but he's powerful and has plenty of skill, he makes mistakes but he will learn. Think he is a Cook islander so don't think we could fit him in.
I seem to remember a few on here in the know stating how much we where overloaded with back rowers to backs. Maybe that was already being addressed? Maybe Pearson should be cut a bit more slack imo
once a black and white always a black and white COYH
Joined: Oct 11 2005 Posts: 2100 Location: city of hull
hull2524 wrote:I seem to remember a few on here in the know stating how much we where overloaded with back rowers to backs. Maybe that was already being addressed? Maybe Pearson should be cut a bit more slack imo
you may well be right however i will reserve judgement until i see who we are signing
hull2524 wrote:I seem to remember a few on here in the know stating how much we where overloaded with back rowers to backs. Maybe that was already being addressed? Maybe Pearson should be cut a bit more slack imo
I had a bit of a hissy fit when we switched attention from the backs to the back row. I'm wondering now whether this was planned all along. I'm not certain we would have resigned Michaels if it was but I'm chastened enough to wait and see who we bring in before criticizing our management further.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
