Having skin in the game means an investor is likely to want to ask strong questions of a lazy underperforming team and Head cosch

Potentially yes although you may get better decisions if the emotion is taken away

Richie myler DOR.

Is that a question for pearson?

Beggers can't be choosers though. If the local interest isn't there, as AP said last night, then do we stick with what we have and, likely, continue the slide or do we take the opportunity for fresh funds wherever they are coming from or whatever the motive is?

https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/adam-pea ... ata-90214/

https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/adam-pea ... ata-90214/

I never saw that as a threat to take them to court, I saw that as him saying that he can prove we're spending the cap if he's pushed to do so. Same as when he invited people to come and see the books. He was being bullish.

Serious About RL is such a joke of a newsletter it's ridiculous. Nothing but click bait headlines from them.
Not even close to threading to take anybody to court, he just used it as a metaphor for how easily he could prove what were spending.

Cant you sleep?

he would be too embarrassed to answer that
Such an important position for a club in transition and he appoints Myler a current player with no real connection to players in Australia and NZ which is what we need