Joined: Feb 03 2004 Posts: 3697 Location: United Kingdom
Hull were 18/1 to beat Wire but I see this as even tougher and I’m backing FC but want 46 start to feel confident
Some expect FC to have a real go
I don’t see that - sorry to say
We are in a long rut going back to last season and it will take something spectacular to break the rut
Uncle Tony’s honeymoon period has long gone and the ‘new coach’ impetus has fizzled over time. Simon Grix seems to have had little impact and Stanley may just be another Lee Crooks type of temp appointment
I think the only chance we have of a spark is winning at Caravan park - win there like 2016, and TH at could change things but not this week
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8185 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
Dave K. wrote:With Brown definitely put I'd go with this.
Walker Russell Carlos Mcintosh Martin Hoy/Brown Smith Sao Brown/Houghton Ese'ese Okunbor Staveley Houghton/Lane
Bullock Ashworth Balmforth Lane/Gardiner
As good a servant as Danny has been, for me Brown is the better hooker and is just as sound defensively. I'd also go with Balmforth on the bench as he offers a different threat as he has a bit of pace about his game and is quite a smart player with some guile that we are badly lacking. I'd like to see Ligi actually given a run at 13 which is the position he was brought in to play but was moved to prop due to us having a lack of quality and size when he arrived.
So 1 to 13 would be pretty much same as you have but with Brown in at 9 instead of Houghton, Hoy in the halves (subject to any internal discipline issues) and Sao at LF with Ashworth as a starting front row with Ese'ese.
Bench would be Bullock, Gardiner, Balmforth and Lane.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25776 Location: Back in Hull.
Chris71 wrote:As good a servant as Danny has been, for me Brown is the better hooker and is just as sound defensively. I'd also go with Balmforth on the bench as he offers a different threat as he has a bit of pace about his game and is quite a smart player with some guile that we are badly lacking. I'd like to see Ligi actually given a run at 13 which is the position he was brought in to play but was moved to prop due to us having a lack of quality and size when he arrived.
So 1 to 13 would be pretty much same as you have but with Brown in at 9 instead of Houghton, Hoy in the halves (subject to any internal discipline issue) and Sao at LF with Ashworth as a starting front row with Ese'ese.
Bench would be Bullock, Gardiner, Balmforth and Lane.
No chance in the world Houghton gets dropped out the 17, I'd be amazed if he doesn't start hooker, think it's in his contract.
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8185 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
Dave K. wrote:No chance in the world Houghton gets dropped out the 17, I'd be amazed if he doesn't start hooker, think it's in his contract.
Unfortunately I don't disagree as just think we are now back to playing a player for the sake it, rather than the overall picture and balance of a 17 that takes to the field. Looked to have more cohesion and more organisation at Warrington with Hoy/Smith even with a very inexperienced team and a man down.
Sunday seemed a deja vu moment under Hodgson with strange team/bench selection along with the non use of players on the bench.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8185 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
hull2524 wrote:Can see the points about Houghton and he certainly needs to be spelled. But I think more pressing problems are our halfbacks.
Problem is we just simply haven't got any quality in the halfback positions and in all honesty we are back to having makeshift halves until Trueman is back, who can hopefully have a good injury free run the rest of the season. Though I do think Morgan Smith is doing a decent job for us currently so Trueman/Smith may prove a good pairing.
Having seen the difference specialist halves can make and given the need for a geniune specialist half, knowing we were already resigned to not having Trueman back until at least Easter, then Clifford returning home it makes the recruitment decision to give Houghton an extra year and also sign Brown a poor one and possibly a poor/complacent contingency plan. I know that the game here is not awash with 6 & 7's but we always seem to be the one club that struggles in this area of recruitment.
But it just makes me wonder if the club has not learnt anything from previous poor/lack of halfback appointments and trying to put square pegs in round holes that its tried so many times until we had Kelly/Sneyd and latterly Trueman/Clifford, granted they didn't play much together but the quality and specialty was most certainly there.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum