Joined: Jun 08 2008 Posts: 2213 Location: Purgatory
Rupert Pupkin wrote:Your telling me that Fitz couldn't do a very fine job in the front row?
I'm saying that his effectiveness will be massively reduced. We are desperately crying out for some heavy prop forwards that can bend the line. Fitz is a grafting second rower, and not built like a prop (Although we only really have Moa that is!). If we stick him at prop it would be as effective as sticking Radders there. It's not the solution we need!
The words of fools mean nothing to one who resides in the truth.
Joined: Jan 10 2007 Posts: 6766 Location: Stalking Jerry Langford
Raggytash wrote:I'm saying that his effectiveness will be massively reduced. We are desperately crying out for some heavy prop forwards that can bend the line. Fitz is a grafting second rower, and not built like a prop (Although we only really have Moa that is!). If we stick him at prop it would be as effective as sticking Radders there. It's not the solution we need!
We will have to agree to disagree then, I think he will start at prop for you guys. I dont think his effectiveness will be reduced as basically Fitz is a grafter these days.
For me as it stands at the moment, next years pack IMO would be:
8. Fitz
9. Houghton - time to step up to first choice.
10. Cusack
11. Burnett
12. Hame
13. Berrigan
Plenty of options for the bench in the forwards.
A good mix of a bit of everything in that line up, sure I will get shot down though lol
I don't see it as a job. It is a passion and love that we all share. Neil Hudgell
Rupert Pupkin wrote:We will have to agree to disagree then, I think he will start at prop for you guys. I dont think his effectiveness will be reduced as basically Fitz is a grafter these days. For me as it stands at the moment, next years pack IMO would be:
8. Fitz 9. Houghton - time to step up to first choice. 10. Cusack 11. Burnett 12. Hame 13. Berrigan
Plenty of options for the bench in the forwards.
A good mix of a bit of everything in that line up, sure I will get shot down though lol
kidding me aren't you?? washbrook at 13 for me, hame at prop, fitz in second row, another prop to come in and manu on the bench
Never criticise a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes.........that way you'll be a mile away and have his shoes.
Joined: Mar 07 2003 Posts: 4460 Location: ^Hiding in between them^
Just been told by a reliable source from inside the club that thankfully his passport has turned up but he snapped both his hamstrings bending down to pick it up off the doormat!!
To be honest Rupert, I'll be happy if Tickle, Radders and Dowes are not part of the starting line up. Where in this line up does Berrigan play? Back in the halves? Centre?
The words of fools mean nothing to one who resides in the truth.
Joined: Jan 10 2007 Posts: 6766 Location: Stalking Jerry Langford
Raggytash wrote:To be honest Rupert, I'll be happy if Tickle, Radders and Dowes are not part of the starting line up. Where in this line up does Berrigan play? Back in the halves? Centre?
I thought my the team I put up originally was fine, none of them were in the starting line up
I don't see it as a job. It is a passion and love that we all share. Neil Hudgell
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum