Chris28 wrote:I can only assume Lee Jenkinson bought a job lot of those tattoo sleeves and couldn't shift them. Hoping we'll buy them in the club shop.
Poor signing for mine, and we'll need a pass for the car park at Red Hall too
Bet Lynch wrote:I have a very good idea what most get up to they are not angels nor do I expect them to be, however tbf to Horney he is actually a model professional and very much a family man. It was only a couple of season ago we had Wierbargate hitting the press, putting Westy, Watts & McGoldrick together unfortunately is not a good idea, McGoldrick won't change why should he is nearing the end of his career.
You can't go around baby sitting players or not signing players because they may react differently. Who is running this squad ? Us, the players or Peter Gentle ?
Anything can happen when you sign a player, you dont know McGoldrick wont change and you don't how bad the problem is. In fact it could be that on his day off he may like to get totally smashed, then so be it. I don't believe for one second he wakes up in the morning and has a drink straight away or thinks have having a drink all the time. The way you are going on your making out like they are all alcoholics who will be drinking during training.
Personally I have had enough discussion on this matter for one day anyway.
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
pmarrow wrote:Even so people must still have brains to realize one mistake or game don't make a player. If he is wearing the black and white whether we like it or not, we should support him and hope he does well.
The sad thing is, if McGoldrick ends up being a pretty decent signing and also manages to somehow kick start his career again, how many on here will congratulate him or say they were wrong. Not many, because some people just love to be negative.
As I say he won't be first choice, so I don't know why people are overreacting like he is going to be playing every week.
But just as one game/mistake doesn't make anyone a bad player, nor would McGoldrick having a good game change the fact that for several years he's been a substandard cheap shot merchant.
There a few players I wouldn't want the club to stoop to, he's one of them. I'd sooner the club contracted syphilis than him.
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
carl_spackler wrote:But just as one game/mistake doesn't make anyone a bad player, nor would McGoldrick having a good game change the fact that for several years he's been a substandard cheap shot merchant.
There a few players I wouldn't want the club to stoop to, he's one of them. I'd sooner the club contracted syphilis than him.
This. A 1000 times this.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
carl_spackler wrote:But just as one game/mistake doesn't make anyone a bad player, nor would McGoldrick having a good game change the fact that for several years he's been a substandard cheap shot merchant.
There a few players I wouldn't want the club to stoop to, he's one of them. I'd sooner the club contracted syphilis than him.
I can't believe some on here are trying to convince me that this is a decent signing. Probably the same individuals who thought O'Carroll and Jamie Ellis were better than mediocre!!
Smiggs wrote:I can't believe some on here are trying to convince me that this is a decent signing. Probably the same individuals who thought O'Carroll and Jamie Ellis were better than mediocre!!
Smiggs wrote:I can't believe some on here are trying to convince me that this is a decent signing. Probably the same individuals who thought O'Carroll and Jamie Ellis were better than mediocre!!
O'Carroll would be a decent prop if he could stay fit for more than three games at a time. Agree about McGoldrick, though - how anyone can see his potential signing as anything other than a massive disappointment is beyond my comprehension.
Joined: Oct 19 2003 Posts: 17898 Location: Packed like sardines, in a tin
Smiggs wrote:I can't believe some on here are trying to convince me that this is a decent signing. Probably the same individuals who thought O'Carroll and Jamie Ellis were better than mediocre!!
Plus why release Ellis and sign tattooman? Surely Ellis would be cheaper and as likely to get a game?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
