Why would losing Pearson give us all a boost?
What would give us a boost would be an announcement that most of the contracts given out by Myler are now cancelled and and the club are bringing in some quality players.
3 years for Chamberlain thats a joke and four players who currently are not in their clubs first team squads.
Go Ritchie we believe in you

Because he is out of money and ideas and has proven to be a bad leader, so he serves no purpose being here. Even if the next.owner proves to be no better people will at least stick with the club buy another pass and see how things go, many are simply not going to listen to Pearson anymore.

Then who would sign for us if we did that…..like come on you’ll commented when someone else mentioned this that no agent or player in his right mind would sign for us now or in future.Also the fact that a signed contract is legally binding.If you don’t like it…don’t re-new and pi££ off and before you or Jake say owt,yes I don’t go and don’t have a pass but Christine it a rest,they not be world beaters but a improved squad,new back room staff and a no nonsense coach….what more can the club do to please whinging gits like you

Mints retiring....

Hardly having a pop at the club. I said he'd be a useful squad member for not much cash. Certainly no worse than Chamberlain and in a position where we've got a 34 year old and 2 kids. If people don't agree I don't care. Willie Peters seems to think he's OK and I'd take his opinion over anyone on here. Except me, of course

I didn't see any games yesterday but I can't believe abdul has got even fatter. He's a disgrace to himself. The only way he'll lose weight is if the club pay for him to have a gastric band fitted.
Complete waste of money

Whilst Peters had done some great recruitment, he has also signed a few as back up and them moved them on quickly, Hall, Senior Aydin, Butterworth, Reynolds etc.

Looks like Canterbury are parting ways with the foxx wonder if he'd fancy a year over here, we can dream

Love it when fans put this response but then obviously care enough to put a counter argument?

Thhey always want to have the last word, even though its falling on deaf ears.