Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25863 Location: Back in Hull.
Windy winger wrote:Hull offered the same money as rovers , only reason Hadley is leaving is because he wants to be playing most weeks now at his age .Not just coming off the bench for us for 20 min now and again .And that’s from Hadley himself !
Windy winger wrote:Hull offered the same money as rovers , only reason Hadley is leaving is because he wants to be playing most weeks now at his age .Not just coming off the bench for us for 20 min now and again .And that’s from Hadley himself !
According to Radford HKR offered more money to both players which Hull couldnt or wouldnt match. Now Radford never lies does he?
bonaire wrote:According to Radford HKR offered more money to both players which Hull couldnt or wouldnt match. Now Radford never lies does he?
No I’m sure he doesn’t , unless it benefits the club . I know who I believe , he could have stayed but wants to play and also get on with and be appreciated by his coach . Which he hasn’t had for a long time !
Windy winger wrote:No I’m sure he doesn’t , unless it benefits the club . I know who I believe , he could have stayed but wants to play and also get on with and be appreciated by his coach. Which he hasn’t had for a long time !
Windy winger wrote:No I’m sure he doesn’t , unless it benefits the club . I know who I believe , he could have stayed but wants to play and also get on with and be appreciated by his coach. Which he hasn’t had for a long time !
Joined: Feb 09 2004 Posts: 7735 Location: Here there and everywhere
IR80 wrote:As good as Houghton is, I wouldn't call him a one off, we've had better, Swain for example.
I don't disagree with you saying Swain was better overall, to be fair Swain was the best hooker in the world. But Swain would occasionally take a breather in a game, Houghton rarely does, which is why he is unique. If you don't need to interchange your 9, in theory we should have more punch coming off the bench.
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8221 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
Bottom line is both Hadley and Litten were offered deals to stay at the club but both decided they wanted a better chance of first team rugby and you can't begrudge them that as it can be a short career.
Unfortunately for Litten he was never going to shift Danny Houghton and as he plays 80mins, Littens chance's where going to be few and far between. As for Hadley again he will be down the pecking order with the new signings coming in and seemingly Ellis playing on next season.
So money aside they just wanted to play regular first team rugby and for me that shows they are decent lads who just want to play. That said our value of both Hadley and Litten would probably be a little lower due to them being seen as fringe players rather than the frontline 17 where as Rovers seemingly see them the other way around due to their roster and circumstances.
Good luck to both of them.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
Windy winger wrote:First of all he’s not going to come out and say it to hdm , but if you read between the lines there you can see all hasn’t been well .
Which lines are those that you can see?
@Chris71 sums it up nicely.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25863 Location: Back in Hull.
Windy winger wrote:First of all he’s not going to come out and say it to hdm , but if you read between the lines there you can see all hasn’t been well .
All I read from Hadley, is positive things about Radford, now I know he isn't going to say negative things, but if he had a fall out , I'd doubt he would say some nice things about Radford woild he.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
