Kosh wrote:Contrary to popular opinion, coincidences do happen. As fun as conspiracy theories are, beware of straying into Mugwump territory. That way lies madness.
Also, we do keep an eye out for sock-puppet accounts and take steps where appropriate. And we have better tools for spotting them than you do.
Thanks Kosh, and we all know Knockers, comprehension is much better than mine.
Mrs Barista wrote:Rude, there's really no need. Just saying there are precious few instances of this happening multiple times in one post on here, then you get several in 24 hours from posters with different names but very aligned opinions. Fun times.
What because we both don't think Radfords up to the job, theirs plenty I don't agree with Knocker on, I just tend not to comment and try ripping him to bits for his opinion, theirs plenty on here waiting to do that, and he does often have a valid point
Joined: Feb 11 2014 Posts: 1073 Location: Hill Valley
Why oh why does every thread on this board seem to end up descending into childish bickering?
On the subject of Dean getting a chance, it's a tough call. Personally I'd like to see him and other youngsters get their chance this week. That said, we are currently on a three game losing streak so I can understand why Radford may not want to take that chance.
Plus he may want to see what the players response is like after the players meeting.
Last edited by Doc Brown on Wed Mar 16, 2016 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Doc Brown wrote:Why oh why does every thread on this board seem to end up descending into childish bickering?
On the subject of Dean getting a chance, it's a tough call. Personally I'd like to see him and other youngsters get their chance this week. That said, we are currently on a three game losing streak so I can understand why Radford may not want to take that chance.
Plus he may want to see what the players response is like after the players meeting.
And having made public the players meeting , which apparently generally leads to players who were picked out by the rest of the team for not performing etc being dropped , it will then ignite further speculation into exactly why those players had been singled out and what they'd been doing/not doing even if any change is just a decision to give some one a rest , let them find some confidence in the reserves/19's etc. That could be more damaging. Stick with the same squad apart from those that are injured I think will be the way he'll have to go.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum