Post subject: Re: Ben Crooks in Super League return – but NOT to Hull FC
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:22 pm
Raggytash
Player Coach
Joined: Jun 08 2008 Posts: 2212 Location: Purgatory
Dave K. wrote:Fair assessment (although, I think he has potential to be top class), he certainly isn't 3rd rate like a previous poster claimed.
I think the point is, that I think he is a better player (Or at least has more potential) than any of our current centres at the club.
Hopefully if we recruit right and Jack Logan continues to develop it won't matter about Crooks.
I am disappointed and feel the club is at least partly responsible for this, but some of the posts on here a way over the top.
Out of interest, is Ben playing 3rd grade in the NRL, who are the Eels 2nd grade?
Wentworthville Magpies are Eels second grade, but they have two teams Dave. I didn't say he was third rate - I said third grade - which is a term about him I lifted directly from the Eels forum.
The words of fools mean nothing to one who resides in the truth.
Post subject: Re: Ben Crooks in Super League return – but NOT to Hull FC
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:23 pm
Raggytash
Player Coach
Joined: Jun 08 2008 Posts: 2212 Location: Purgatory
Kosh wrote:I didn't see anyone call him third rate.
I'm not sure there's any evidence to justify a claim of his superiority to any of the centres at our cub. In fact I'm pretty sure there's none whatsoever. Even if you stretch that to potential the evidence is hardy compelling. He had one terrific season and has done nothing since at two different clubs on two continents.
Pretty much the point I was trying to convey.
The words of fools mean nothing to one who resides in the truth.
Post subject: Re: Ben Crooks in Super League return – but NOT to Hull FC
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:40 pm
Dave K.
International Board Member
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25989 Location: Back in Hull.
Raggytash wrote:Wentworthville Magpies are Eels second grade, but they have two teams Dave. I didn't say he was third rate - I said third grade - which is a term about him I lifted directly from the Eels forum.
Fair enough, but he certainly isn't a 3rd grade Centre over here.
Post subject: Re: Ben Crooks in Super League return – but NOT to Hull FC
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:41 pm
lummy
Club Coach
Joined: Feb 03 2005 Posts: 1087
3rd grade you say in Oz - but good enough for SL Dream Team here and that frankly, is all I'm bothered about.
To say Lineham made Ben Crooks look good is bordering on lunacy and is simply not fair to the lad. Centres can make wingers look good, but don't buy into this little theory at all.
Post subject: Re: Ben Crooks in Super League return – but NOT to Hull FC
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:43 pm
Dave K.
International Board Member
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25989 Location: Back in Hull.
Kosh wrote:I didn't see anyone call him third rate.
I'm not sure there's any evidence to justify a claim of his superiority to any of the centres at our cub. In fact I'm pretty sure there's none whatsoever. Even if you stretch that to potential the evidence is hardy compelling. He had one terrific season and has done nothing since at two different clubs on two continents.
I use my eyes as evidence, he is a better Centre than Yeaman and Micheals IMO and could be argued about Sa (Who after a good start to the season has disappointed at centre and is often injured).
Heres my 2p worth on the matter....... crooks, was given a chance by pg, who obviously rated him very highly, the season went great for him and lineham, culminating in a dream team spot.....BUT, since then, pg got the chop, and our new coach IMO doesnt rate him nowhere nearly as highly as the previous.... crooks has skill, no doubt, but tge sheer lack of size has had the coaching staff questioning him eversince he couldnt bulk up in the off season...... at times he got bullied, and without a big winger (lineham) outside him, i feel he would have looked average, when in defence anyways... i also beleive crooks himself thought he's better than he actually is, im sure radford and him had "words" regarding this, obviously tgey didnt agree, and both parties thought it was best to move on......, hes struggled to get a start in the reserve grade over in oz, and that probably says it all....... talent - yes...... finished article - nowhere near
Post subject: Re: Ben Crooks in Super League return – but NOT to Hull FC
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:20 pm
Staffs FC
Club Coach
Joined: Feb 12 2005 Posts: 13126 Location: East Staffordshire
Raggytash wrote:Holy Moly! Crooks is a THIRD grade centre, and wouldn't make the first team at Hull next season. If he did, that would show a genuine lack of ambition from the club! You really think Yeaman, Sa or Naughton wouldn't at least manage 2nd grade in the NRL? Even Tansey and Thorman played first grade! Radford, the fans, nor the 3 Aussie coaches Crooks has worked under this season have failed him. He's failed himself, and was the epitome of a one season wonder. The ridiculous knee-jerkery on this issue is amazing!
If we'd signed a 22 year old third grade centre, you'd be going absolutely mental!!!!
Brilliant post. Good luck to the kid I hope he makes it but I doubt he will.
"To play your best football you need players with enthusiasm and drive and energy." - Peter Sterling
Adam Pearson said not wrote:I know there are two franchises and two clubs (in Hull) and that will remain forever more
Post subject: Re: Ben Crooks in Super League return – but NOT to Hull FC
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:10 pm
airliebird,runninglate!
Player Coach
Joined: Feb 19 2009 Posts: 1957 Location: East stand!
His dream team season was at a massive cost to the players directly around him. In defence he was 3 in. With a second row inside and half back outside. Basically body guards. So big men/2nds/centres ran at him and the 2nd row looked after him. Tricky decisions were made for him by Horne usually in open play defensive situations. Then in attack was mostly used for the fancy stuff. Which obviously kinda worked as he and tom made dream team and scored a few. But Radford came in and I imagine he thought I can't run a team looking after individuals. Or effectively lose a right side for 1 man. So it seemed to me he changed it and forced Crooks to look after himself. He went to a conventional defensive pattern and Crooks failed. Badly. Personally I thought radford did what he could with him. In - terrible Took him out a while Brought him back - terrible again On loan - got some form,and confidence came back v London and looked good. Next game couldn't tackle a dinner. Radford couldn't defend for him. He gave him the chances imo
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum