Post subject: Re: Do the pundits watch a different game?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 6:05 am
knockersbumpMKII
International Chairman
As I said on the match thread well done to all & a win is a win...now I've watched the game in full and the commentators are right.. We are so desperately poor in attack, the passing is too slow, Houghton is one of the culprits and couldn't change the direction of play if he had a force 12 gale blowing in the opposite direction..Oh and did we even have any dummy runners or anyone backing up for breaks? Yes we've had a tough schedule and our defence was pretty good for the most part but Widnes moved the ball far better than we did, had no weight in their forwards to speak of and thank god for their mistakes. Shaul's inability to get the pass out with a 3 on 1 (Ah Van knock down) was criminal.
If we can win games playing that badly I'll take it, frankly though if we do it'll be a miracle!
Post subject: Re: Do the pundits watch a different game?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 6:45 am
Kosh
Moderator
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Mild mannered Janitor wrote:Not sure who said it but the phrase "lies, damn lies and statistics"
It was the 70th minute on Friday against Widnes before we off loaded from the tackle.
We play like the Huddersfield team of the early 2000's when Mal Reilly was in charge. They were bottom of the league but had the least handling errors of any team. The reason was that any player knocking on more than twice in a game was dropped. Hence, they didn't pass.
I'm sorry, but that's a gross exaggeration. We do actually have plenty of players who look for the offload but our support play is so lacking that we rarely get the opportunity to make one successfully. Even so, we are no better or worse than many other sides in the competition.
We have enough faults without inventing others.
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Post subject: Re: Do the pundits watch a different game?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 2:50 pm
carl_spackler
Player Coach
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
It's commonly accepted that the officiating is pretty poor, and I think that's accurate. I think where inaccuracy kicks in is how much fans think it is weighted against their team.
I didn't think we were particularly on the bad end of a refereeing performance on Friday, in all honesty. A couple of mistakes made for/against each team, that's about it. The fact that one of those mistakes led to a try for them but not vice versa is partly chance, partly that we weren't/aren't clinical enough when given the ball from 20 yards out. We had a chance that we shouldn't have had, as did they. That we didn't take advantage and they did is not the officials working against us.
The perception of everyone always being offside against us often comes from our slow work at the ptb, IMO. Even the actual act of playing the ball, watch how we are slower than most other sides, and then our passing is often slower, too. These seemingly small things add up to extra yards teams can move up in defence with good line speed. You can also add in that we seem to run back into the more highly populated ruck areas more than most other team as well. On Friday, the fact that Widnes clearly looked fresher than us at the start of the game created a bit of an illusion that they were constantly a mile offside IMO. Actually, they most often just had more energy than us and were moving up quicker. I thought it was noticeable that it faded away as the game went on and they tired, and it wasn't just that Silverwood didn't police it in the first half but then did in the second.
Post subject: Re: Do the pundits watch a different game?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:17 pm
oud3pstander
Player Coach
Joined: Dec 14 2009 Posts: 444
Disagree they played the chance percentage game of offside when in our half take the risk ,when in own stay onside. Lots of times where two yards in front of old Silverback he has a tendency to only look one way for offside.
Post subject: Re: Do the pundits watch a different game?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:27 pm
ccs
International Star
Joined: Aug 15 2011 Posts: 5318
I always thought that the defending side could not move forward from the 10 metre mark until the ball hand been played (heeled) backwards. Nothing to do with how fit the defending side might be or how slow the play the ball might be.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Post subject: Re: Do the pundits watch a different game?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:42 pm
Bombed Out
International Star
Joined: Feb 21 2012 Posts: 1420
carl_spackler wrote:It's commonly accepted that the officiating is pretty poor, and I think that's accurate. I think where inaccuracy kicks in is how much fans think it is weighted against their team.
I didn't think we were particularly on the bad end of a refereeing performance on Friday, in all honesty. A couple of mistakes made for/against each team, that's about it. The fact that one of those mistakes led to a try for them but not vice versa is partly chance, partly that we weren't/aren't clinical enough when given the ball from 20 yards out. We had a chance that we shouldn't have had, as did they. That we didn't take advantage and they did is not the officials working against us.
The perception of everyone always being offside against us often comes from our slow work at the ptb, IMO. Even the actual act of playing the ball, watch how we are slower than most other sides, and then our passing is often slower, too. These seemingly small things add up to extra yards teams can move up in defence with good line speed. You can also add in that we seem to run back into the more highly populated ruck areas more than most other team as well. On Friday, the fact that Widnes clearly looked fresher than us at the start of the game created a bit of an illusion that they were constantly a mile offside IMO. Actually, they most often just had more energy than us and were moving up quicker. I thought it was noticeable that it faded away as the game went on and they tired, and it wasn't just that Silverwood didn't police it in the first half but then did in the second.
You won't get many on this thread actually agreeing that it goes both ways.
Post subject: Re: Do the pundits watch a different game?
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:46 pm
Bombed Out
International Star
Joined: Feb 21 2012 Posts: 1420
ccs wrote:I always thought that the defending side could not move forward from the 10 metre mark until the ball hand been played (heeled) backwards. Nothing to do with how fit the defending side might be or how slow the play the ball might be.
You're right if done correctly the defending team cannot move until the attacking player's foot touches the ball. However every team pinches a couple of yards it just depends how lenient the ref is.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum