K-Diddy wrote:I only saw the highlights of the game as I was away, who was supposed to be the victim because all I saw was Meadows getting offended on what looked like somebody else’s behalf. If the evidence is strong then why did it take London over a week to produce it?
Don’t know why it took so long. That has to be questioned.
I either thought homophobic or racist, towards Meadows or Adebiyi, but more probably the former. It was instantly after he was badly done by with a knock on call - which was a strip (not that it condones any discrimination).
bornagain wrote:Unfortunately some people do make things up, sometimes they make up the most outrageous lies and they can be very convincing.
And most of the time, people don’t. We have to believe victims and hope it’s not made up.
Why would someone make up discrimination, when it won’t affect them at all going forwards? A player banned wouldn’t help a London player at all. It’s more of an unlikely story then he actually said something.
What's unacceptable language? If you call someone an "effing C@@@" would you get 6 matches for that? Pretty much standard thing to call each other when i used to play. Even your own team mates
Jake the Peg wrote:What's unacceptable language? If you call someone an "effing C@@@" would you get 6 matches for that? Pretty much standard thing to call each other when i used to play. Even your own team mates
tommyfromhull wrote:Why would someone make up discrimination, when it won’t affect them at all going forwards? A player banned wouldn’t help a London player at all. It’s more of an unlikely story than he actually said something.
You don’t see how having one of our better players banned for a number of games could benefit London?
davey41 wrote:You don’t see how having one of our better players banned for a number of games could benefit London?
Given there is no relegation then no, there is no benefit to London. Even it there was that feels a little too pre-mediatated to be plausible. The only conceivable benefit is getting a player sent off in a game but in that scenario the accusation would be false so the referee would have to think he heard what was claimed so it seems a bit of long shot.
davey41 wrote:You don’t see how having one of our better players banned for a number of games could benefit London?
I refuse to believe players are trying to get opposition teams’ players banned to help them not finish bottom of the league by making up discriminatory comments.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
