Perhaps I was giving the Administrators far too much credit then. If they've done that without plans in place to fulfill an upcoming fixture and possible source of income they should be answering some serious questions.

I'd rather have Cockayne, better player IMO.

you'd give up on the rest of the squad for the sake of one guy??? please.........

If he has signed then we've got this one badly wrong. Apart from him being a complete tool he's also absolute gash! What value would he bring to the team/squad?

What actually wrong with Mcgoldwick, granted hes nothing special but he aint no anti-christ like some are making out. Apart from that though why do we actually need him, isnt he a back?

dont get the mcgoldrick thing at all.....complete liability, and not that good in my opinion

In some ways it's a big game of chicken.

The RFL, HMRC, potential investors - none of them want the Bulls to go into liquidation, but they have to act like they're willing to. First one to blink picks up the tab, as 'bridging funding', accepting so many pennies per pound owed or getting lumbered with historic debt, respectively. But if none of them blink, they all lose; a club, even the pennies/pound or something to invest in.

I suspect the administrator is trying to force hand(s). And tbf you can see why.

Cover, i guess...

Ellis has gone
Russell is a bit rubbish

So we've really only got Horne, Seymour and Nicklas as HB/FB for the rest of the season

I didn't buy a season pass this year anyway because of work and have missed a few games already so McGoldrick signing would pretty much make me lose interest in all but the biggest games. Not only is he a thug and an idiot but he is a god awful player. I know it would only be a stop gap but if you're losing the likes of Moa and Tickle through injury and bringing in the likes of him we may aswell give Salford our playoff spot and be done with it.

That said I very much doubt there is any truth in it anyway.

i hope to lucifer it aint true. poor player and generally not nice person