Dave K. wrote:On the game, I see Sneyd picked up a man of Steele point, now I haven't watched the game again, but for me he wouldn't have been in my top 8 Hull players, nevermind top 3 of both teams. I've been disappointed with Sneyd the last few games, we know he isn't creative with the ball in hand or has a good running game, but his kicking (not goal kicking) has been off.
I know he might have knock and missing his partner, but we need more from him
We say this about Sneyd every season but some still see him as top half back
bonaire wrote:More like desperation considering there was a possibility of a longer ban on a failed appeal. If Mau was going to be fit then dont see the point but looks from this that he wont
Or maybe he he will, along with Reynolds.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
So Clubb’s penalty was reduced as whatever was said was “in the heat of the moment”. Don’t understand that. What had gone on? He was playing rugby; it’s his job. With regard to Farrell’s head high tackle some people suggest there was no comparison with Connor’s tackle. What are they suggesting? That he executed it with such precision that he knew no damage would be done. The penalty should be for the act, not the outcome.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29797 Location: West Yorkshire
His Bobness wrote:I think the final score flattered Hull and expect Wigan to win again next week.
It won't matter if Reynolds does or doesn't play your best chance of scoring will as ever be Sneyd's precision diagonal kicks to the wing and of course his brilliant goalkicking.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
