weaver93 wrote:Summed up very nicely Jake..
Going forward, the bar has been set to a high level..
I think Radford, needs to take a long hard look, at why our attack, as a team has diminished.
IMO ,Our attack declined, when we removed Pryce at 6....
Shaul, is a great runner, but doesnt have the nouse, to create the openings , but coupled with a ball playing 6, or a direct 6.. works.
For mine Sneyd and Carlos are too similar...
Too many occasions, players take the ball from a standing start.. this has to be addressed in training.. - maybe a new attack coach, would aid this problem.
According to Lee Radford when interviewed, "Is it basics?" - He said "No, its nouse"
The Jake Connor signing is interesting,, will he play 6 or 1????????????.....
Also interesting, recruitment wise.. Will be... IF its Ellis.Pritchard & Minichiello last season in 2017?
Do they replace them with 3 backrowers???
Good post in response to Jake
Our two best attacking performances Catalan and Saints away Pryce was at 6
Tuimavave had a decent game last night particularly defence but he is not a six to take the team forward,undoubtably he is a much better centre.We need an established six preferably with pace.
you only have to look at what Williams does with his pace and he is still only 21.
I like Jamie Shaul but agree with your comments.Last night he was trapped twice in goal because he ran the ball out in the wrong direction.Thats lack of what you say nouse.
Looking forward after next season second row will be a worry.Warrington have young lads like Currie and Hughes,Wigan have Bateman all established players yet still very young.
We dont seem to have anyone yet stepping up from the 19s or under 23s and making a position for themselves.We have yet to see what Dean Hadley can do with a run as a regular starter but when you lose the quality of Ellis,Mini and Pritchard they are big shoes to fill.