People comparing it to the ban for the guy in Championship 1 Is just daft. That guy sat there and blatantly applied pressure to the leg in a deliberate manner. This was just holding down gone wrong IMO but is worthy of a ban

I'm not so sure about that. The only teams we didn't beat away under Gentle were Hudds, Leeds, and Widnes. I personally think the problem under Gentle was precisely what you outline, on our day we could beat anyone, but the consistency wasn't there (EDIT: I'd like to clarify that I mean consistency of performances. Weirdly, we did somehow manage some consistency of results by hanging on defensively in games when we were below our best).

Gentle was a better coach than Lee, league finishes prove that.

havnt we been over this time and time again, I agree by the way but its been said over and over and over again

Come on this was more than holding down gone wrong. What a pathetic excuse that is.
Anyone knows who's played rugby not to grab ankles and roll that's not holding down.
It was a deliberate movement whether he intended the outcome or not.

not pathetic just what he sees,whats pathetic is you going on about everything to do with hull fc is crap

The way the Physio was moving his ankle it doesn't look like the ankle is broken

If sneyd gets a 3 match ban,mcGuire should get 6 matches for wriggling,priceless.

Yes because that's what I do all the time Radford aside I've never criticised hull or have a go, so what's pathetic is your constant defence of all things black and white and need to criticise posters that don't share your continual rosy outlook on hull FC so go find evidence before you decide to have a pop eh there's a good lad.

I disagree with his opinion and this is merely not a hull FC thing it's unwarranted play from a player irrespective of which club he plays for.
Now run along if you wish to be condescending.

It doesn't.