Let's face it apart from Lineham our three quarters aren't the quickest in Super League and a fully fit Michaels will certainly add some pace.

Think I was justified on the 'Injuries' thread saying he'd be good enough to fill the role, wonder where all the naysayers are??

I am not a Yeaman fan but have to say he has not done much wrong in the last two matches.
That said I agree he doesn't offer much of an attacking threat and maybe when Michaels is match fit this is where he will fit into the team if Talanoa and Lineham are both playing.

Haven't you read all the posts before yours.

Yeah, except for the ones who were saying he wasn't good enough, not fit enough, stupid to play him because still recovering from injury yadda yadda.

So you're right (again), apart from the reference to not being good enough, still not fit enough, and struggling after the game with the same knee problem.

ccs wrote:Probably here. Cheers ccs.

ccs wrote:Probably here. Cheers ccs.

Maybe you could list the people who said he shouldn't play? There are none and you're a total KR troll idiot.

Thought he showed enough on friday to prove he good be a really good addition.showed that bit of class first half when he put kick in instead of risking going in touch.can remember there been a good chase but not sure if got drop out from it but thought then if that was last year with jason crooks it would of ended with a scrum to wire.you don't have his c.v if you hav'nt got a fair bit of talent

Thought he showed enough on friday to prove he good be a really good addition.showed that bit of class first half when he put kick in instead of risking going in touch.can remember there been a good chase but not sure if got drop out from it but thought then if that was last year with jason crooks it would of ended with a scrum to wire.you don't have his c.v if you hav'nt got a fair bit of talent