Freddie Miller. wrote:Reports I have heard is that he will be with Souths for the 2014 season before any possible move to Union. So if true still a chance?
Sorry Freddie you're right in theory, but Souths won't win the nrl this year.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Joined: Jun 09 2006 Posts: 2616 Location: 28000 LYrs from the centre of the Galaxy
Still struggling to think where he'll play. eight? probably, but unless he already possesses a good understanding of union it could be risky. any other pack position is too specalised and he's probably too small.
That's the biggest load of rubbish I've ever read.
The character assaination is in full swing.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Sheldon wrote:That's the biggest load of rubbish I've ever read.
The character assaination is in full swing.
The press love building people up, just to tear them back down again. While it was only a brief mention, if the press continue to bring their Mum in to it, I can't see any of them sticking around.
easthullwesty wrote:I would say that this exposes the need for the ability to sign a marquee signing outside the salary cap. Mind, I'm not convinced its just the money he's going for (if he does). Possibly wants the privilege of not winning a world cup in either code
i don`t want to be a hero, just a credit to my breed.
easthullwesty wrote:I would say that this exposes the need for the ability to sign a marquee signing outside the salary cap. Mind, I'm not convinced its just the money he's going for (if he does). Possibly wants the privilege of not winning a world cup in either code
What is the definition of a "marquee" signing? Someone who's played NRL? A World Champion ? Who would have the final say?
i don`t want to be a hero, just a credit to my breed.
Joined: Feb 12 2005 Posts: 13126 Location: East Staffordshire
He'll do well at union not least because the skill levels are so low that anyone with serious talent will be lauded. Hopefully he wont get bored during the endless stoppages and set pieces that characterise that rich and expertly marketed sport.
"To play your best football you need players with enthusiasm and drive and energy." - Peter Sterling
Adam Pearson said not wrote:I know there are two franchises and two clubs (in Hull) and that will remain forever more
stonesy wrote:What is the definition of a "marquee" signing? Someone who's played NRL? A World Champion ? Who would have the final say?
It would be quite simple I imagine. Each club would be allowed to nominate any player as a marquee player, regardless of their background or experience. That players salary would not count on the cap.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
