downtheante wrote:I have never booed FC. Also, I often applaud an opposition try but I thought the reaction to Celtic's try was OTT. Similar happened with Salford in the cup and they went on to beat us. Thankfully the lads just ignored the crowd and got on with their job on Friday night.

There were some positives to be taken from the game, and let's forget for a moment that "we should be slaughtering teams at the bottom of the table" becasue (a) we have been poor ourselves this season so we are also near the bottom and (b) each team is capable of beating any other this year.

Positives for me (it's soooooooo easy to be negative):
(a) Although we spilled the ball too often we never capitulated - nilled Celtic in the first half and only let one try in although they had had numerous multiple sets throughout the match. We haven't seen that very often this year.
(b) Some great tries at the end - including winger tries from passes (yes, I know Yeaman wasn't playing but I still think that we would have been better with him at centre)
(c) Hall played well (from the start) and defended well.
(d) Tansey fitted in well and played well after only one week with the team
(e) Richard Horne's defense was much better than it has been
(f) Agar picked the team (apart from loose man) that many had been calling for.
(g) the interchanges were much better than previously
(h) Sam Moa was excellent making real inroads at good pace.
(i) although Berrigan dropped a couple of howlers (bad passes etc) he picked some great holes in Celtic's defense and defended well himself.
(j) Hall's try was in a third consecutive set after two drop-outs. We have rarely forced that position this year and managed to score - certainly breaking the defence down from hand rather than from a kick.

Robbo4 wrote:He also said....... "without doubt it has a pretty detrimental effect on the team". So there is no doubt in his mind that the fans are causing the team to play poorly. Nothing to do with the players or his tactics then.

downtheante wrote:Now you tell me would it "help" if your boss or workmates or customers booed you if you had a few bad days in the office?

Wollagong Way wrote:One of the main issues i had on Friday was the lack of any attacking structure, but hey i shouldn't have been suprised as it's the story of Agar's stewerdship. I didn't expect us to rack up 40 points against them, i did expect us to look interested and threatning going forwards....we only did that in the last 20 minutes. I wouldn't have been so narked off as i was if we had created some chances...we looked totally inept.

And as a guy said to me if this is what their reaction is to the Cas hammering god helps us......how true!

downtheante wrote:Hey look - that's why this is such a great country - free thought, free speech. We're all perfectly entitled to have our own opinions and voice/publish them.

I personally interpret this as not "cause and effect" but exacerbating the position that currently exixts (for whatever reason - be it crap coaching or something else).

Bigger Daddy wrote:No it wouldn't help. Agar is the players' boss, and he publicly slated them for a lack of comitment last week (and has complained about them previously) - does that help?
The fans were doing what Agar himself has already done. If the fans are wrong to do that, then so is our coach.

downtheante wrote:but we did rack up 22

Robbo4 wrote:I'm not someone who boos the team and I'm certainly not someone who cheers the opposition but as fans they have payed for the right to do that if they so wish. In a perfect world Agar has the right to criticise those for doing so. This isn't a perfect world though and once a coach starts on the fans it usually means the end is near.

Robbo4 wrote:You are James Rule and I claim my £5

downtheante wrote:but we did rack up 22