hull2524 wrote:Totally stripped of any attacking player. Goodness have some of you played rugby. We lost. But wow drama queens out in force
I appreciate the lack of recognised halfs but it would be nice to see some sort of attacking shape even if its badly executed but there is nothing atm.
hull2524 wrote:2 poor teams. Effort and tackling fine. But playing with no half's. Still 5.Hodgson won't be going anywhere.
not so sure about Hodgson.Pearsons patience will be wearing thin.No doubt in my mind it was Pearson who canned Reynolds and not Hodgson. Gaz Ellis and Shenton doing a good job and can see this duo stepping up as coach and assistant before the season end. As for our halves when you have Houghton going only one way to Lovodua and cutting out Hookem completely then thats where a coach should intervene and tell him to vary the play.
Hasbag wrote:Wonder where we go next week then. Potentially Shaul back to the wing and Litten in at full back? Or Barron straight onto the wing? Think I'd like to see Litten given a go. He might offer a bit of a spark from full back. Shaul made good carries tonight but he just really struggles to find a pass when he chimes into the line.
Think I'd keep shaul at fullback, Wynne on the wing with Griffin centre. Full week with joey and hookem training in the halves.
Joined: Nov 23 2009 Posts: 12749 Location: The Hamptons of East Yorkshire
ComeOnYouUll wrote:Peter Gentle vibes. Decent bloke but maybe out of his depth in a top job.
Gentle had bad luck too and was similarly unable to change things.
I have to say, personally, I find him pretty wet and uninspiring. Pearson looked pretty p!ssed off when the camera cut to him early in the second-half.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum