Mrs Barista wrote:Well clearly you do. But let's say you're a billionaire. Your username could well be a play on that, would make sense. You still have a limited time on earth as do we all. Spending what's left of it following a team you barely tolerate traipsing to Australia seems crazy. The world is full of beautiful places, untapped experiences, cultures we're not familiar with. Yet you choose to invest your most valuable commodity, time, in following Lee Radford literally to the ends of the earth. What a beautiful tacit expression of devotion; more powerful than the litany of criticism of his regime that characterises your contributions on here.

bonaire wrote:i pointed this out yesterday.When we are short in the second row why play Hadley at 9 when his preferred position and best position is second row.
He also tightens up the edge defence.
We could easily have played Washbrook or even Fash at 9 because as you say we are not running the ball only passing from a play the ball.
Our bench choice yesterday was poor.Just cant see the thinking of Radford on that one and the Cas bench just overrun us.
Green should have played if fit,Tuimavave played from the start with Griffin on the bench.
Our left edge defence with Griffin and Talanoa has to be one of the worst in Super League.Griffin is a liability in defence and our two wings have to start to hold the line otherwise we will leak tries on both edges.
Jamie Shaul quite rightly has come in for criticism and could be dropped but i hope he is given another chance so that we dont disrupt the team too much given Kelly could miss the game.

Plum Bob wrote:Dear me Mrs B your letting your usual measured comments slip. Your comments are nothing but personal invective. Please stick with comments on the game which you can do with competence. Or is that only when we are winning.

hull2524 wrote:Everybody has a good moan, but some on here am sure get of on it, drama queens