Dave K. wrote:Hope he doesn't play Yeaman at centre, he has to trust his young players or they won't develop.
I have problem in having Yeaman on the bench, in place if Thompson, who I aren't a fan of, but he should be no were near the backs unless we have no choice.
Why you not a fan of Thompson Dave, you something against gingers?
Unless radford is worried about logan and timuavave's defence against the big salford back line, I can't see why on earth he would even consider yeaman ahead of thompson on the bench.
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12672 Location: Leicestershire.
Jake the Peg wrote:Unless radford is worried about logan and timuavave's defence against the big salford back line, I can't see why on earth he would even consider yeaman ahead of thompson on the bench.
As well as being able to do a spell in the SR, KY could also cover in case of an injury from 1-7. Directly for the centres, Tuimavave could be moved into the halves or to Fb, and I guess either he or Logan could move to wing in an emergency.
Can Thompson cover centre? Probably not as well as Yeaman.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Mild Rover wrote:As well as being able to do a spell in the SR, KY could also cover in case of an injury from 1-7. Directly for the centres, Tuimavave could be moved into the halves or to Fb, and I guess either he or Logan could move to wing in an emergency.
Can Thompson cover centre? Probably not as well as Yeaman.
Jake the Peg wrote:Unless radford is worried about logan and timuavave's defence against the big salford back line, I can't see why on earth he would even consider yeaman ahead of thompson on the bench.
It's a concern. Junior Sau running at Tuimavave may be a bigger problem than Logan. Carlos is pretty inexperienced at centre and it's regarded as the hardest position to defend in. I have more faith in Logan's defence. So maybe he's been included on this basis, not that I'd agree with it.
The other possibility is maybe Yeaman deserves his inclusion as a back row option? Maybe Yeaman is outshining Thompson in training. If this is the case, I'd have no problem with it.
Lot's of 'ifs ' and 'maybes'. They're just guesses before some of the usual Yeaman haters jump in, I'm not privy to what happens at training, none of us are.
Dave K. wrote:Just dont see it, scores the odd try and makes a break, but far too inconsisteent, thought he was poor 2nd half of last season.
His defence at times is poor and isn't big enough for a prop or play in the middle IMO, I'd prefer Hadley or Whiting there.
Just shows how differently us supporters view players, cant agree with any of that, yeh is form dropped of 2nd half of the season, but was still one of our better performers. And as for size, stand him next to the bigger players in our team and theys not much in it, hes a big lad. Have him over Hadley any day, for me Hadley should be getting loaned out
The 19 shows Radford wants a “pack strong bench" including 1 replacement who can play outside the pack. This will be 1 of either Thompson Washbrook Yeaman.
Throw in the versatility of Fonua, Talanoa and especially Tuimavave and we have cover for most positions.
Should anything happen to Sneyd, then yes it’s a bit of a conundrum but that’s true for most sides if the 7 goes down.
Bench selection is always a gamble and you can’t cover every possibility with 4 replacements, especially if your looking for predominantly Pack rotations as most sides do.
We all see things differently including the coach, and it changes for the opposition and game plan. I think he’ll have it covered to match his game plan for this encounter.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum