the cal train wrote:We looked sloppy in D round the ruck and on our line, and our attack can never be described as aspirational. That being said, what an improvement on only a matter of weeks ago. Really pleased we showed some fight, even three or so weeks ago I think at 18-6 we'd have totally collapsed and it'd have finished 42-6.
Balmforth is the real deal, hope he's signed up already but he's going like he's playing in the shop window.
Agree our defense and effort on the field is much better but when you look at the Warrington error count at 19 and a 44% completion rate then in reality the scoreline could have been in the forties.
That said the amount of possession in good field position we had plus the tries we bombed we should have won that game