knockersbumpMKII wrote:Said like a blue blood Tory, you really have no idea how to make a business work successfully do you? EPIC FAIL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc08a/cc08a330764d0b3189a7e36a7e0682900aa59a0e" alt="CRAZY :CRAZY:"
The fact is AP has failed at the most basic of levels in running a business, he's failed to run the organisation in the manner it should be. He should have done a top to toe shake down, installed the right people, kept those that could, got rid of those that can't (Rule should have stayed for a while longer for me). Look at investing in a way that doesn't shout tight-wad penny pincher, the good investments he has put in have actually being just that, investments, some of which will actually rise in value.
The pay-offs he's had to make are partly because he didn't do his job properly and didn't get the right people in, if you think he wasn't aware of certain things going on then you damn Pearson for what he really is.
A 2 bit Arthur Daley 2nd hand car salesman. Spend a bit here, cut a bit there, make do and mend, huff and puff when you've being found out, never admit you're wrong then try flogging a dead horse after you've banged on about how much money you've lost on the deal when the punter starts to walk away and then blame anyone but yourself for why it's knackered
What we need is a strong CEO, someone to make sure the 'directors' know what they are supposed to be doing, they have limited experience within industry, one of them hasn't worked anywhere else but the KC, and none of them are individual leaders, they are directors in name only, nothing more.
We also do not need a 'rugby man', that's not the priority, we have a director of rugby (of sorts) already, if they have had dealings within rugby great, BUT more than anything else they need a background of hands on management of a large operation, someone prepared to face up to an owner and tell them they're wrong over certain things. I don't want a yes man in charge.
A strong CEO ensures stupid things like the Shaul incident never even get to the point where a coach whom is unable to express himself in the manner one would expect to the media gets to sit in the chair without at least being prepared what to say and what not to say instead of sounding like a thug and completely idiotic. Our so called communications director failed massively on that as on previous rantings our coach has provided.
A CEO stops dodgy deals being done (if indeed there were any), it's his job to ensure VFM, not cutting back but ensuring an investment is worth what we are paying, property, player or otherwise. If he doesn't know the value of players it's his job to find out and if that figure s justified, follow recommendation's, garner advice not just from within the club but from external sources also.
Sadly, AP failed to employ a strong CEO from the off, THAT is a massive failure, THAT has cost us and him dearly many many times over what it would have cost him up front. But you can't see that can you?
I really hope AP sells us, tbh if he's here more than 12 months I'd be surprised.
You've mentioned these errors of judgement before. But we are where we are which is skint, according to Seb. If there's no cash, there's no cash. I have absolutely no doubt that we need a CEO. But if there's no cash, there's no cash. To generate cash, either the stayaway fans come back and fund a better future for the club or we sell our assets. Where is the cash coming from to pay off Radford today if we are skint? You seem totally unable to answer a basic question. You're deluded if you think on dwindling gates and a progressively more challenging rental arrangement that AP will suddenly pay Radford off, upgrade the coaching staff and fetch in a CEO. Totally unrealistic.