Joined: Jun 09 2006 Posts: 2616 Location: 28000 LYrs from the centre of the Galaxy
i hate pies wrote:Lineham to wire?
If the money was right I'd let him go but he only signed a 4yr deal last year. However I did hear Radford was looking to offload a few bad eggs and his name was mentioned but I took as a silly rumour because we're playing $hit.
major black wrote:If the money was right I'd let him go but he only signed a 4yr deal last year. However I did hear Radford was looking to offload a few bad eggs and his name was mentioned but I took as a silly rumour because we're playing $hit.
The bad egg we need to offload is the coach himself.
Joined: Jan 11 2005 Posts: 3915 Location: West Hull
Smiggs wrote:The bad egg we need to offload is the coach himself.
Funny how things change....
"There is absolutely no chance of Tom Lineham or any of our young talent leaving this club," Pearson told the Mail.
"Lineham, Shaul, Crooks, these kids are our future and it doesn't matter who wants them, there is no chance anybody will buy them. It will happen over my dead body."
Smiggs wrote:The bad egg we need to offload is the coach himself.
Funny how things change....
"There is absolutely no chance of Tom Lineham or any of our young talent leaving this club," Pearson told the Mail.
"Lineham, Shaul, Crooks, these kids are our future and it doesn't matter who wants them, there is no chance anybody will buy them. It will happen over my dead body."
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 26014 Location: Back in Hull.
weaver93 wrote:Funny how things change....
"There is absolutely no chance of Tom Lineham or any of our young talent leaving this club," Pearson told the Mail.
"Lineham, Shaul, Crooks, these kids are our future and it doesn't matter who wants them, there is no chance anybody will buy them. It will happen over my dead body."
Think people are getting excited by this rumour, nobdy has said he is a bad egg or is leaving.
How many of these rumours come true?
weaver93 wrote:Funny how things change....
"There is absolutely no chance of Tom Lineham or any of our young talent leaving this club," Pearson told the Mail.
"Lineham, Shaul, Crooks, these kids are our future and it doesn't matter who wants them, there is no chance anybody will buy them. It will happen over my dead body."
It's ok Pearson saying the young kids are the clubs future, why did he tie lineham & shaul to long term deals but not crooks? Because he will drop the odd bad egg, how's he getting on for the magpies anyway?
easthull fc fan wrote:It's ok Pearson saying the young kids are the clubs future, why did he tie lineham & shaul to long term deals but not crooks? Because he will drop the odd bad egg, how's he getting on for the magpies anyway?
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 26014 Location: Back in Hull.
deslawson wrote:He's not doing as well as yeaman.
Not often I agree with Des, but he is right, I'd much rather have Crooks at centre than Yeaman and Michaels.
I am still hoping he will come back to Hull, after his spell in Oz, but not likely to happen with Radford in charge and when he signs for another SL club, I think we will see what a great player he can be.
Dave K. wrote:Not often I agree with Des, but he is right, I'd much rather have Crooks at centre than Yeaman and Michaels.
I am still hoping he will come back to Hull, after his spell in Oz, but not likely to happen with Radford in charge and when he signs for another SL club, I think we will see what a great player he can be.
ill second that. Big mistake sacking Gentle and appointing Radford Big mistake by Radford and Pearson binning Crooks
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
