Joined: Oct 26 2007 Posts: 2570 Location: East Hull is Wonderful
i can also inform the fans on here that the Allams DID offer the SMC back to the council for £1, the only problem was that they gave us that day to agree, on further investigation the owners had put the £ms that Adam borrowed against the SMC back on the accounts as a debt which would have left the council with a multi million pound bill, making an agreement essentially impossible. so with possible legal action now in the pipeline you will find that it will go quiet as anything said would likely be raised in court, but as I said earlier we are fighting this.
Barton Flyer wrote:texted my son to say light at the end of the tunnel, unfortunately it was a train coming! Re:- Rovers v Salford 29/03/09
HFC Boy wrote:Hull FC have not risen to the Challenge of Hull KR .
Success consists of getting up just one more time than you've fallen down.
phil webbo wrote:i can also inform the fans on here that the Allams DID offer the SMC back to the council for £1, the only problem was that they gave us that day to agree, on further investigation the owners had put the £ms that Adam borrowed against the SMC back on the accounts as a debt which would have left the council with a multi million pound bill, making an agreement essentially impossible. so with possible legal action now in the pipeline you will find that it will go quiet as anything said would likely be raised in court, but as I said earlier we are fighting this.
Wasn't that Bartlett ??
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Good on Hull City Council for the threat of legal action. The arrogance of the Allams knows no bounds and they must be stopped.
Just seen this on twitter
Quote:Hull Community Sport @Airco_For_All @angus_young61 @RadioHumberside @BBCLookNorth Kingston Panthers have informed us basketball equipment has been sold by SMC
ComeOnYouUll wrote:Good on Hull City Council for the threat of legal action. The arrogance of the Allams knows no bounds and they must be stopped.
Just seen this on twitter
And that just highlights the pettiness of the egotistical madman, 2nd hand basketball gear will be worth peanuts, surely the City's great philanthropist would have at least gifted the gear to the club he's evicted.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
UllFC wrote:And that just highlights the pettiness of the egotistical madman, 2nd hand basketball gear will be worth peanuts, surely the City's great philanthropist would have at least gifted the gear to the club he's evicted.
I'd say it was unbelievable, but really it's entirely to be expected. The volume of stuff going on and the fronts they're choosing to fight on is reaching mental proportions now.
I said this a while ago, but I just don't see what the end game is here now. As most sane people recognised early on, objective 1 was to get the stadium for nowt and borrow against it for a commercial development. When that door was shut my perception is that everyone then became a target for different reasons - the council for not gifting him a public asset for private company game, FC for sharing the tenancy, City's own fans for not buying a baseless marketing idea.. but what is the ultimate objective. City are currently a viable operation and need to remain so for him to protect his investment, but is peeing off the FA and City's fans the best way to continue? Or creating a storm in the press on a daily basis? What exactly is success now for Allam? I have absolutely no idea.
Mrs Barista wrote:I'd say it was unbelievable, but really it's entirely to be expected. The volume of stuff going on and the fronts they're choosing to fight on is reaching mental proportions now.
I said this a while ago, but I just don't see what the end game is here now. As most sane people recognised early on, objective 1 was to get the stadium for nowt and borrow against it for a commercial development. When that door was shut my perception is that everyone then became a target for different reasons - the council for not gifting him a public asset for private company game, FC for sharing the tenancy, City's own fans for not buying a baseless marketing idea.. but what is the ultimate objective. City are currently a viable operation and need to remain so for him to protect his investment, but is peeing off the FA and City's fans the best way to continue? Or creating a storm in the press on a daily basis? What exactly is success now for Allam? I have absolutely no idea.
It is baffling, you'd have thought all his attention would be keeping City up, with a bumper TV deal windfall that would pay him back his investment and also make them more attractive to a buyer if they do. But instead he's taking on Kingston Panthers!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum