Stanley Unwin wrote:I wasn't there, but did they not put the biting incident on report? If so, why nothing in the report?
Who knows?
You can only conclude that the "incident" was put on report, but the ref made no reference to biting. Probably a sensible approach if it was inconclusive, but the media had already made a meal of it.
Or maybe "let's call it quits" is now part of the disciplinary procedure.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Mar 23 2018 Posts: 6675 Location: Kingston upon Hull
ccs wrote:Who knows?
You can only conclude that the "incident" was put on report, but the ref made no reference to biting. Probably a sensible approach if it was inconclusive, but the media had already made a meal of it.
Or maybe "let's call it quits" is now part of the disciplinary procedure.
Perhaps Jake could have been allowed his “he ####### bit me interview” as Mr Hill was afforded this luxury.
Joined: Mar 21 2017 Posts: 159 Location: Back to God's own country!
It appears that the disciplinary panel is now letting lots of stuff go that would have got penalised with bans a couple of months ago (and some were ridiculous, e.g. Scott Taylor's ban). My guess is that, after lots of public criticism for over-zealousness early in the season, the powers that be have decided to take a more lenient approach.
"If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't." - Emerson M. Pugh
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
